Reply to thread

Re: FIX for ZoneAlarm & KB951748 issue released


Sam wrote:

> xxexbushpig wrote:

>> Well it might have been a "dimbulb" (which is a great new word BTW), 

>> but it wasn't as big a dimbulb as the Microsoft person who issued the 

>> KB951748 update that screwed up millions of people!

> Look, I understand where you are coming from. I have been bitten by this 

> "bug" too (well, not me personally, but couple of relatives I help with 

> computer stuff).

> Also note that I am no Windows fan boy. So I don't get giddy eyed and 

> swoon at every new Windows release or update and neither do I 

> *religiously* defend their "secure OS" or their pricing policies (as 

> some do there ... *ducks*). I just use it as a tool for whatever I have 

> to do.

> So, in my view this particular update, the KB951748, appears to fix some 

> DNS vulnerability in Windows. Good. But it also messed up Zone Alarm. 

> But MS has nothing to do with Zone Alarm and ZA people already gave out 

> an upgraded version of ZA which solves this. It would have been prudent 

> of ZA people to have seen this coming and taken corrective measures 

> earlier. As long as MS gave sufficient prior warning to all the vendors 

> in the field about this update, I don't think they are to blame.

> My 2c.


Sam, Read this article:

The DNS bug was found & should have been a co-operative update July 8.

http://securosis.com/2008/07/08/dan-kaminsky-discovers-fundamental-issue-in-dns-massive-multivendor-patch-released/


The article does not say who was notified, but the bug was *not* found

by MS and MS has no responsibility to tell others, as this was all

supposed to be done July 8.


IMHO, ZA missed the boat or was just slow.


Back
Top