W
wwemerson
Guest
Re: Need to disable offer from Outlook Express "to free up disk space, outlook express can compact messages"
My frustration is related, but somewhat different than many here in this
post ... hope someone has encountered it and has a 'fix'.
Specifically, at random , even from a clear Desktop, one of my machines
will
'launch' this 'compacting' message, and continue posting that annoying
message as many as 20 or 30 times, all at once. The 'message' windows
will fill up 3 rows in the task tray.
None of my other machines have this problem (except when I reach my set
'99' 'compact check count' limit, which is fine).
Has anyone else seen this problem and know how to fix?
All 4 of my machines are running XP w/SP3 and all other windowsupdates.
My Security Suite is from Computer Associates, Security Suite 2008 with
only AntiVirus, AntiSpam, and AntiSpyware loaded. (The one difference in
the failing machine from the rest is, it runs out in my shop, using a
D-Link DWL-G510 PCI wireless adapter - not sure that comes into play
here, however, the failing machine has this one difference.)
This bug is really freakin' me out!
My frustration is related, but somewhat different than many here in this
post ... hope someone has encountered it and has a 'fix'.
Specifically, at random , even from a clear Desktop, one of my machines
will
'launch' this 'compacting' message, and continue posting that annoying
message as many as 20 or 30 times, all at once. The 'message' windows
will fill up 3 rows in the task tray.
None of my other machines have this problem (except when I reach my set
'99' 'compact check count' limit, which is fine).
Has anyone else seen this problem and know how to fix?
All 4 of my machines are running XP w/SP3 and all other windowsupdates.
My Security Suite is from Computer Associates, Security Suite 2008 with
only AntiVirus, AntiSpam, and AntiSpyware loaded. (The one difference in
the failing machine from the rest is, it runs out in my shop, using a
D-Link DWL-G510 PCI wireless adapter - not sure that comes into play
here, however, the failing machine has this one difference.)
This bug is really freakin' me out!