Re: Installing WSS 3.0 on a TS server?
Ah in that case, you should be fine. It sounds like you have more than
enough resources that you won't have any inference with that few users.
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
"WetBehindEars" <WetBehindEars@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:250D92A5-B541-4C4B-B984-4A8533AE7C7A@microsoft.com...
> Ok. How about in this scenario. Its a business of 5 people with two
> servers. The first server is the DC along with everything else
> (Exchange/file server/BES). We installed a new TS box for them. Dual
> core
> 64 bit box and 200gb of disk space. There is less then 10 gigs of space
> on
> the DC and their server is about 5 years old. There may be two people
> accessing the TS at any given time. I figured the TS box would be better
> because of the space issue, load balancing, memory capabilities and
> processor
> speed. What are your thoughts on this?
>
> "Jeff Pitsch" wrote:
>
>> It would be a really bad idea. TS should be run by itself so that users
>> aren't affected performance wise.
>>
>> Jeff Pitsch
>> Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
>>
>>
>> "WetBehindEars" <WetBehindEars@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>> message
>> news:26F790E6-56BB-4E3C-861C-A8D4F005D8A5@microsoft.com...
>> > Can you do that and will it work properly?
>>
>>
>>