R
RealCat
Guest
On Windows Vista, there are two good new applications, Windows Photo
Gallery and Windows Mail (not entirely new but new). But what confuses
me is that there are "very" similar applications such as Windows
"Live" Photo Gallery and Windows "Live" Mail. They are very, very
similar but the "Live" series provides slightly more features. For
example, there is "Create photo panorama" which is the sole reason why
I installed it while I have Windows Photo Gallery. I don't understand
why Microsoft keep both of them. Wouldn't it be much simpler and clear
if Microsoft make only one version of them, then embed them on Windows
Vista and let Windows XP users download freely from Windows Live site?
For those who don't know that there is Windows Live Photo Gallery,
visit
http://get.live.com/photogallery/features
And you can find Windows Photo Gallery on your start menu by typing
photo.
Gallery and Windows Mail (not entirely new but new). But what confuses
me is that there are "very" similar applications such as Windows
"Live" Photo Gallery and Windows "Live" Mail. They are very, very
similar but the "Live" series provides slightly more features. For
example, there is "Create photo panorama" which is the sole reason why
I installed it while I have Windows Photo Gallery. I don't understand
why Microsoft keep both of them. Wouldn't it be much simpler and clear
if Microsoft make only one version of them, then embed them on Windows
Vista and let Windows XP users download freely from Windows Live site?
For those who don't know that there is Windows Live Photo Gallery,
visit
http://get.live.com/photogallery/features
And you can find Windows Photo Gallery on your start menu by typing
photo.
