Re: Linux is not readly for prime time
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FAB wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime
>>>>> time:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>> for that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one
>>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do
>>>> you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in
>>>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the
>>>>> effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>> this judgment.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> False.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning
>>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not
>>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format
>>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not
>>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they
>>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>> available.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as
>>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense
>>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially
>>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its
>>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The
>>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just
>>>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of
>>>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There
>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> More of your lies?
>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and
>>> daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>> Loser!
>>
>>
>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>
> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
Frank's jealous.
Alias