K
kevpan815@noreply.com
Guest
Re: The indictment of adam albright, aka ringmaster.
Frank wrote:
> By PowerUser:
> "Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
> making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
> main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
> recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
> enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
> that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
> stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
> are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
> be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
> astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
> defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
> counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
> aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
> ungrateful politics.
>
> I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
> Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
> profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
> eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
> to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
> their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
> heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
> Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
> clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
> responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
> guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
> reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
> he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
> Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
> find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
> that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
> recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
> conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
> Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
> re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
> repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
> know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
> proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
> It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.
>
>
> We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
> principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
> most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
> irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
> people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
> thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
> ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
> grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
> means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
> existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
> that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
> key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
> from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
> nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
> company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
> those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
> should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
> living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous
> autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
> hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
> an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
> religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
> prompts them to precipitate riots.
>
>
> Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
> consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
> were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
> for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
> thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
> things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
> of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
> to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
> education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
> the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
> discerning among us can see right through it.
>
>
> It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
> Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
> when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
> center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
> shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
> to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
> practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
> comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
> you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
> surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
> Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
> catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
> back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
> words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
> the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
> course, to the likes of Adam Albright."
>
> Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
> lying pig?
> For your reading pleasure!
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7
>
>
> Enjoy!
> I know I did!...LOL!
> Frank
>
Re-Format Your Computer And Install Open Source Linux, Just FYI.
Otherwise, Go Away Microsoft Fan Boy Just FYI.
Open Source Linux Is The Future Of All Computing, Just FYI.
I Remain Very Proud 2 Call Myself Alias #2, Just FYI.
Ring Master Is Alias #3, Also Just FYI.
May Be Some Day I Can Convince Spanky DeMonkey, Bill Yanyire, And You 2
Become Alias #'s 4, 5, And 6, Also Just FYI.
Frank wrote:
> By PowerUser:
> "Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
> making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
> main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
> recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
> enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
> that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
> stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
> are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
> be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
> astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
> defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
> counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
> aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
> ungrateful politics.
>
> I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
> Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
> profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
> eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
> to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
> their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
> heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
> Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
> clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
> responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
> guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
> reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
> he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
> Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
> find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
> that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
> recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
> conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
> Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
> re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
> repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
> know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
> proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
> It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.
>
>
> We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
> principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
> most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
> irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
> people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
> thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
> ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
> grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
> means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
> existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
> that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
> key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
> from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
> nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
> company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
> those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
> should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
> living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous
> autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
> hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
> an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
> religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
> prompts them to precipitate riots.
>
>
> Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
> consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
> were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
> for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
> thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
> things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
> of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
> to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
> education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
> the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
> discerning among us can see right through it.
>
>
> It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
> Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
> when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
> center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
> shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
> to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
> practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
> comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
> you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
> surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
> Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
> catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
> back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
> words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
> the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
> course, to the likes of Adam Albright."
>
> Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
> lying pig?
> For your reading pleasure!
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7
>
>
> Enjoy!
> I know I did!...LOL!
> Frank
>
Re-Format Your Computer And Install Open Source Linux, Just FYI.
Otherwise, Go Away Microsoft Fan Boy Just FYI.
Open Source Linux Is The Future Of All Computing, Just FYI.
I Remain Very Proud 2 Call Myself Alias #2, Just FYI.
Ring Master Is Alias #3, Also Just FYI.
May Be Some Day I Can Convince Spanky DeMonkey, Bill Yanyire, And You 2
Become Alias #'s 4, 5, And 6, Also Just FYI.