Windows Vista RE: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

  • Thread starter Thread starter GT
  • Start date Start date
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

> If your development staff are not able to cope, I might suggest that you
> review your hiring practices


Yeah there should be ONE simple rule for hiring..

You start the interview with ONE question: DO YOU LIKE VISTA

If the answer is YES then he is a MORON and you wont hire him.. NEXT
PLEASE!!!

lol




"DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote in message
news:4aj5f4lkg6mgh02bgcgfqnqvgkjosb53nq@4ax.com...
> In message <5943EEFC-42A6-4D0F-A10F-3924C86276BF@microsoft.com> GT
> <GT@discussions.microsoft.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>
>>If ANY one can run Vista successfully for a year I will be very surprised.
>>I
>>have had it for a month and have had 17 crashes due to it. The first one
>>was
>>in the first 10 minutes. My company is at the leading edge for graphics,
>>games, music, and media. We all know that Vista is NOT a good thing. We
>>are
>>looking into ways to convert to mac to avoid the billions of serious
>>problems
>>with Microsoft Windows.

>
> Since I pulled my nVidia cards and replaced them with ATI (about three
> months before the "nVidia drivers are horrible" news stories), I haven't
> had a single bluescreen on my desktop.
>
> I've had one reinstall of Vista, when I went from x86 to SP1 x64.
>
> If your development staff are not able to cope, I might suggest that you
> review your hiring practices.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

vista is 15-20 % slower than xp

"Telstar" <none@none> wrote in message
news:O7w5MVQLJHA.4796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> "news.microsoft.com" <none@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:%23$wzF0OLJHA.1308@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> "Rich" <r.green@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:un6dH$NLJHA.3744@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Been running since Feb. 17, 2007 with nary a hitch.
>>> Solid, fast and dependable.

>>
>> What do you use your PC for other than groups, email and surfing the web?
>> How much software have you added? Games? Graphic software etc?
>>
>>>
>>> Amazing isn't it? what you thought you knew?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rich

>>
>>

>
> I use it for video development and DVD mastering. It has never, ever
> crashed.
>
>
>
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Non Sequitur! wrote:
>> work.....Excel, Word and Outlook.

>
> lol...
>
> childs play...
>
> use some real memory intensive programs like premiere or a 3d
> application, and then come back


Well MOST users do NOT use those sorts of applications. The vast
majority of PCs and laptops are used in a corporate environment in
which, most users use office. Period.
Your situation is NOT common. Also many high-end video and graphics
works are actually done on NON-windows OSs anyway.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Non Sequitur! wrote:
> vista is 15-20 % slower than xp
>


And how do you KNOW that Vista is slow on the machine of the poster you
replied to?

Now who's the DORK?
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

I know this from experience after dual booting XP and Vista on a multitude
of different machines and comparing


> Now who's the DORK?


That would include you


"Gordon" <gordonbparker@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:eXAsOuRLJHA.468@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Non Sequitur! wrote:
>> vista is 15-20 % slower than xp
>>

>
> And how do you KNOW that Vista is slow on the machine of the poster you
> replied to?
>
> Now who's the DORK?
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

In message <48f31ae0@newsgate.x-privat.org> "Non Sequitur!"
<only@rret.com> was claimed to have wrote:

>> If your development staff are not able to cope, I might suggest that you
>> review your hiring practices

>
>Yeah there should be ONE simple rule for hiring..
>
>You start the interview with ONE question: DO YOU LIKE VISTA
>
>If the answer is YES then he is a MORON and you wont hire him.. NEXT
>PLEASE!!!
>
>lol


That might explain why your guys are still stuck in 2001's operating
system.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

So graphic designers, web designers and sound engineers are not common? LOL

Are you out of your mind???

There are HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS in the world!

"Gordon" <gordonbparker@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:eawyYtRLJHA.468@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Non Sequitur! wrote:
>>> work.....Excel, Word and Outlook.

>>
>> lol...
>>
>> childs play...
>>
>> use some real memory intensive programs like premiere or a 3d
>> application, and then come back

>
> Well MOST users do NOT use those sorts of applications. The vast majority
> of PCs and laptops are used in a corporate environment in which, most
> users use office. Period.
> Your situation is NOT common. Also many high-end video and graphics works
> are actually done on NON-windows OSs anyway.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't


"DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:4aj5f4lkg6mgh02bgcgfqnqvgkjosb53nq@4ax.com...
> In message <5943EEFC-42A6-4D0F-A10F-3924C86276BF@microsoft.com> GT
> <GT@discussions.microsoft.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>
>>If ANY one can run Vista successfully for a year I will be very surprised.
>>I
>>have had it for a month and have had 17 crashes due to it. The first one
>>was
>>in the first 10 minutes. My company is at the leading edge for graphics,
>>games, music, and media. We all know that Vista is NOT a good thing. We
>>are
>>looking into ways to convert to mac to avoid the billions of serious
>>problems
>>with Microsoft Windows.

>
> Since I pulled my nVidia cards and replaced them with ATI (about three
> months before the "nVidia drivers are horrible" news stories), I haven't
> had a single bluescreen on my desktop.
>
> I've had one reinstall of Vista, when I went from x86 to SP1 x64.
>
> If your development staff are not able to cope, I might suggest that you
> review your hiring practices.



I have run Vista almost from the day it appeared on the market, and I have
not
have a single blue screen. With XP I had quite a few.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

"cqui3" <cqui3@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:421EB300-0D2E-42BD-8CE7-A5CD00F37334@microsoft.com...
>
>
> I have run Vista almost from the day it appeared on the market, and I have
> not
> have a single blue screen. With XP I had quite a few.


Please don't confuse the trolls with facts ;-)
They become agitated and even more obnoxious.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

> If ANY one can run Vista successfully for a year I will be very surprised.
> I
> have had it for a month and have had 17 crashes due to it.


Running continuously (never switched off, only rebooted when Windows Updates
requires it) for 20 months since January 2006.

Zero crashes, zero freezes, zero BSODs. For me, it's the most reliable and
resilient NT-family OS yet.

I made sure the hardware was fully compatible before installing, of course.

I don't know what a "power user" is, but mine gets comprehensively thrashed
a lot of the time:

* the full range of MS Office products in regular use
* production of technical documentation and technical drawings
* software development using VS 2008 and Delphi 2007
* graphics editing using PSP and other products
* audio editing using Adobe Audition
* video editing using Ulead and Pinnacle products
* video conversion and DVD authoring
* web development using various products
* extensive use of Virtual PC 2007 to run XP and VirtualBox to run various
Linux distros
* plus the usual browsing, emailing, etc.

Vista definitely isn't broken for me. If it is for you, I suggest you look
at your hardware or drivers.

But I would say this: nobody should upgrade from XP unless they need the new
features (what's the point?) or are just interested in learning about it.
And if you do upgrade, make damn sure your hardware and drivers are OK for
Vista.

SteveT
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:32:18 -0500, "news.microsoft.com"
<none@nospam.net> wrote:

> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:r3d5f456k880umvu2grt2ramc8liphd62i@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:38:00 -0700, GT <GT@discussions.microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> If ANY one can run Vista successfully for a year I will be very
> >> surprised. I
> >> have had it for a month and have had 17 crashes due to it. The first one
> >> was
> >> in the first 10 minutes.

> >
> >
> > I don't want to get into an argument about this, but I'll tell you my
> > personal experience, which is very different from yours. I've been
> > running Vista here on my personal machine since RTM in November
> > 2006--just short of two years. I have had zero crashes.
> >

>
> If all you do is these groups, email and a little surfing, I doubt even W95
> would crash.



Whether you are right about what would crash doesn't matter, because
your guess about how little I use the computer for is very much
incorrect. I use it for much more, and run more and bigger
applications than most people do. The only respect in which a
significant number of people here are likely to exceed my personal use
is that I don't run any games (other than chess).

Talking about the number of programs running at once, by the way, at
the moment I have ten applications open on the task bar.


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

the granter of sina wrote:

> So graphic designers, web designers and sound engineers are not common? LOL
>
> Are you out of your mind???
>
> There are HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS in the world!


I seriously doubt there are "hundreds of millions' and I know you're not
a graphics designer!...LOL!
Loser!
 
capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

------------------------------

hehehe...hey bozo, too stupid to get your one little install of Vista to
run properly?
It's because you're a loser, an idiot and a moron.
That is a lethal combo!...LOL!
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

I too haven't had any issues since installing the RTM

--

--
John Barnett MVP
Windows XP Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience

Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..


"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message
news:ulbXJNOLJHA.5972@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> Same here..
>
> --
> Mike Hall - MVP
> How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use
> the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc
> Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
>
>
>
>
 
Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:14:46 -0700, Frank <fab@notspam.cmm> wrote:

>capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:
>
>------------------------------
>
>hehehe...hey bozo, too stupid to get your one little install of Vista to
>run properly?
>It's because you're a loser, an idiot and a moron.
>That is a lethal combo!...LOL!


How does it feel to be labeled a fool when Microsoft agrees with what
I said about UAC and you've been exposed as a clueless moron who can
only throw the same feces around over and over like the retarded
little monkey we all know you are.
 
Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

self consciousness is a product of intelligence, and frank lacks that

he doesn't really understand how big a clown he is.. and he keeps going at
it again and again..

what an idiot



"Ringmaster" <bigtop@VistaGeneralCircus.net> wrote in message
news:jbr6f4tqbdkblab76b1d8vaso3o4sragkn@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:14:46 -0700, Frank <fab@notspam.cmm> wrote:
>
>>capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>hehehe...hey bozo, too stupid to get your one little install of Vista to
>>run properly?
>>It's because you're a loser, an idiot and a moron.
>>That is a lethal combo!...LOL!

>
> How does it feel to be labeled a fool when Microsoft agrees with what
> I said about UAC and you've been exposed as a clueless moron who can
> only throw the same feces around over and over like the retarded
> little monkey we all know you are.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

On 13 Oct, 12:51, "the granter of sina" <gran...@yan.sina> wrote:
> I know this from experience after dual booting XP andVistaon a multitude
> of different machines and comparing
>
>


<sigh> but NOT the OP's machine --- dork.
 
Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

Re: Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't

GT wrote:
> If ANY one can run Vista successfully for a year I will be very surprised. I
> have had it for a month and have had 17 crashes due to it. The first one was
> in the first 10 minutes.



You shouldn't judge the OS based solely on your own lack of ability.
Millions of people are using Vista every day, without problem; why
couldn't you?


> My company is at the leading edge for graphics,
> games, music, and media.



Why do I find that so hard to believe, given your opening sentences?
What're you using, crayons, checkers, tin cans, and paper?


> We all know that Vista is NOT a good thing. We are
> looking into ways to convert to mac to avoid the billions of serious problems
> with Microsoft Windows.
>


Good luck with that.

--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot
 
Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

the granter of sina wrote:
> Frank aka the biggest moron that ever lived, will never accept his total
> blundering defeat...


I now believe that you are also sick in your stupid, empty head.
Face it loser, Vista is, and you're not.
 
Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

Re: capin' crunch, the help desk worker wrote:

SO? You believe a whole bunch of stuff that have absolutely no connection
with reality



"Frank" <fab@npam.cmm> wrote in message news:gd0970$g1h$1@aioe.org...
> the granter of sina wrote:
>> Frank aka the biggest moron that ever lived, will never accept his total
>> blundering defeat...

>
> I now believe that you are also sick in your stupid, empty head.
> Face it loser, Vista is, and you're not.
 
Back
Top