Originally posted by Robby
Denaes, do you realize that youre comparing a scripting language with a programming language, Im sorry but it cannot be done.
It was done
I can and did compare them.
You can compare any simularities and differences, so long as you explain them.
You cant just say "Flash is better than .Net" because thats Apple and Oranges. Why is it better, for what jobs?
You can explain what sort of functions one can perform and if it can be performed by the other, and if so, how easy, how many features, how optimised, etc.
I can say that both Flash/ActionScript and .Net can be run off of web pages. Then I can compare that feature:
Flash requires no special serverside software
.Net requires .net compatable software
Ive heard .Net is much quicker and can be used for high traffic programming.
Flash is fairly good at this, but I wouldnt even say its in .Nets league.
Flash is more portable, probobly because there isnt a requirement for a server, just a flashplayer and webbrowser.
.Net is portable to handheld devices (flash just began this about a month ago I believe), though currently is only Microsoft compatable. Can you just run a .Net web app on any computer without recoding or compiling? (im not sure about this)
There I compared something about the two.
This is what you do when you figure out which tool you want to use for a job. You look at what features you need to use, compare the two and figure the trade-offs.
Is the extra speed needed? Do you need the nitty gritty detail of .Net? Do you have access to a .Net compatable server?
Now, Im pretty sure if you compare features, .Net is going to have many more ways to get something done and in better speed with specialized customizations (just streamreader has like 100 variations of streaming)
Also, let me quote my first post in this thread....
If you