US Election 2004

Not that Kerry is a God send, or maybe he will be, but Bush is all about protecting his oil cartel buddies....and thats all hes done. Lets see, the price of gas has gone way up, we had a war with an oil producing country that didnt see the same way as us (quote: "Hes an evil person"), the economy has gone to #####....He got elected (if thats what you call it) by a miss count from...his brother (the governer of Florida). And more and more....
Maybe Hillary should run for President, she did a great job before.
 
Blah Im really not big on politics... but I do know that bush destroys the english language :).

"Rarely is the question asked: is our children learning?"
"They Misunderestimated me"
"I agree, the past is over"
"I know how hard it is to put food on your family"
"You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test"
"Were concerned about AIDS in the White House, make no mistake about it"
"Were ready for any unforseen event which may or may not happen"
"I have made some good judgements in the past, I have made good judgements in the future"

Heh - the list goes on, but I listed the ones which ive heard him actually say... because most of the ones you find on the internet (http://www.politicalhell.com/bush-quotes.htm) are probably fake.

Now - Im NOT implying that I wouldnt vote for bush becuase of this. I mean his ideas and stuff matter. So what if hes not a good public speaker.. heh. Anyways I cant vote so it wouldnt matter :).

-The Pentium Guy
 
I personally cant see how bush has so many supporters

Im sorry im oppinioned so here it goes.
1)removed because i was in error.
2) its no big secret that bush is manipulating everything he can to get his friends (and himself) richer than they allready are. now i agree aiming to get richer is not a bad thing, screwing over your nation and most of the world to get your little possy rich on the other hand.
3)A person on the http://www.computerhelp.forum/showthread.php?t=191539 said that Suddam Housain offered to harbor Osama bin Ladan, proof of this i would like to see they hate each other only marginally less than they hate america. Also on this site someone argued that america shouldnt dissarm its nukes to assure the MAD(Mutually assured distruction) Well lets see first of MAD is a very stupid policy but im not here to argue America should scrap it, id just point out they dont need nukes for MAD they have more than enough other weapons to blow the *** out of any CONTINENT that pisses them off. Not only that but Nuclear warheads arnt designed to take out military targets Nukes are designed to kill civilians plain and simple. NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE WEAPONS OF TERROR! its what they were designed for ex Nukes were first used (by america no less) to kill enough japanese CIVILIANS to scare them into submission.(not only that but the radiation.....)
4)Bush is using the fact that he has power to commit War crimes.
Lets say north korea got pissed of one day, really pissed of, so they went off to the UN and said "look boys those damn *random people*Vietnameese are really pissing us off so we want to take out there leader" as is predictable the un said no well work it out some other way. Anyways little while later north Korea decides enough is enough and invades Vietnam (chosen for no real reason by the way i have nothing against the people of vietnam) what do you think would happen? UN would sit by while North Korea killed over 7000 Vietnameese civilians? I think not.
5)Bush is single handedly (well not quite) destroying the american economy, this is bad not just for america but for the world as much of the global econmy is influenced by the american economy.
6)WAR on terror = BAD IDEA. Why WAR CREATES TERRORISTS. If i had an army and it was my goal to make a group of people hate me, hate me as much as i possibly could how might i do it? KILL SOME OF THEM. then occupy thier country, and through in one of my buddies as leader. Im sure afghanistan loves america now.
7) War in Iraq again bad idea, want Suddam hussien dead assasinate the ******* dont invade his country, while it wouldnt be easy im sure a large scale special ops sorta deal would have done it better, and not lost 1000 american troops, who knows how many iraqi troops and over 7000 civilians.
8)want to make sure that justice is done to those responcible on 9/11 ive got just the ticket, 1st fly out any and all members of the Ringleaders family without proper questioning, Second try and shut down any and all private investigations into the incident. Third when a large group of victims decide to sue one of the nations from which the terrorists came supply your layors... to fight AGAINST this lawsuit. then release some military records, itll make you look credible, just censor out the parts that link you with the Ringleaders folks, thatd really look bad. While your at it annex the oppertunity to invade some oil country, then shift all of the focus over to this new war and away from the fact that you havent even caught the ringleader yet.
"I dont know where he is.You know, I just dont spend that much time on him... I truly am not that concerned about him." saying something like that really inforces the fact that your out for justice.
and the list goes on and on, anyways folks just my humble oppinion, Dont Like Kerry or Nader perticulary just bush has to go! (not for "Gods Sake" for everyones sake)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You(the american public) kicked(leavered) Clinton out
Bill Clinton was in office for 2 full terms - thats the limit for a US president. He didnt get kicked or leavered (?) out.

I didnt read any more of your post as that first part made you sound like an ***. Just my opinion.

-ner
 
Nerseus said:
Bill Clinton was in office for 2 full terms - thats the limit for a US president. He didnt get kicked or leavered (?) out.

I didnt read any more of your post as that first part made you sound like an ***. Just my opinion.

-ner
Fair enough. He was Impeached.... Id argue that your choice to ignore the rest of my post was in error but oh well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are a lot of very, very scary things about George Bush Jr., his brother and their father. But, remember that they are where they are NOT because of their intelligence or integrity, but because of their alliance with oil and "the family" (not meaning the Mafia, but the real family that economically runs the world). Both Kennedys and Perot (a group of very intelligent folks) opposed this family and look what happened to them.

My opinion is to keep voting away from the oil cartel (a term usually associated with drug dealers). Only that way will we really start to heal the Earth and the global economy (dont mistake our involvement in Iraq as anything other than economics...and, of course destroying the "Bush is a criminal" mosaic on the Baghdad hotel floor for all to walk on).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is this a competition on who can make the most uninformed comments about a situation they truely know very little about?

Democracy is doomed to fail, people they strive to be leaders are just power hungary. For that reason they will all do want ever they can to benefit themselves more. Whatever party, whatever country. Unfortunately there is no other system which works either.

Monarchy is great if u have a strong leader, but usually there is 2/3 weak leaders for every strong one. Depotism and Dictorship are usually run by the power hungary, therefore corrupt. Communism well nuff said....

We need to derive a way of finding a non-corrupt method of government, based around the current democracy principle. A system that removes the power more from individuals and puts more power to the people.
 
rifter1818 said:
Fair enough. He was Impeached.... Id argue that your choice to ignore the rest of my post was in error but oh well.
Where is the post?

Was it censored?

these Xtreme boards are inherently thin skinned, so I wouldnt be suprised.
 
Jay1b said:
Is this a competition on who can make the most uninformed comments about a situation they truely know very little about?
This forced me to comment -- the irony.

Jay1b said:
Democracy is doomed to fail, people they strive to be leaders are just power hungary.
Fortunately for us, we live in a Republic not a Democracy.

Jay1b said:
We need to derive a way of finding a non-corrupt method of government, based around the current democracy principle. A system that removes the power more from individuals and puts more power to the people.
The interesting thing here is that this "new" system you describe sounds much like a true democracy -- a system our forefathers studied enough to know it wouldnt work.

Joe Mamma, go back and re-read, the post wasnt removed, Nerseus just decided it wasnt worth his time to read any more than the first couple sentences of it.
 
This forced me to comment -- the irony.
I didnt state anything i didnt know about, but u have.

Fortunately for us, we live in a Republic not a Democracy.

Do WE??? Personally i live in a Monarchy, well in name at least. Also your President refers to your country as a Democracy, so thats good enough for me.

a system our forefathers studied enough to know it wouldnt work.

You mean YOUR forefathers? Dont you think time and technology has moved on since then? Also dont assume everyone is American.....
 
I didnt make any assumptions about where people are from. I did make an apparent faulty assumption that the reader could use context to figure out what I meant by my pronoun usage.

Jay1b said:
Also your President refers to your country as a Democracy, so thats good enough for me.
So do a large part of our (my countrys) population -- passing civics class is apparently a requirement for neither citizenship nor the presidency.

Jay1b said:
Dont you think time and technology has moved on since then? Also dont assume everyone is American.....
Technology, or the lack thereof, had little to do with the selection of a Republic over a Democratic form of government.
 
I did make an apparent faulty assumption that the reader could use context to figure out what I meant by my pronoun usage.

You assumed i was American, thats an incorrect assumption. I am sure most readers could figure out what you meant, myself included. But if it wasnt pointed out to you, then you would continue sounding pompous.
 
Jay1b said:
You assumed i was American, thats an incorrect assumption. I am sure most readers could figure out what you meant, myself included. But if it wasnt pointed out to you, then you would continue sounding pompous.
The fact is that I looked at your location before making my comment and I think if you sat back and gave it some thought youd see that nothing I said made any such assumption. Im going to repeat what I said with clarifications for the pronouns. Now take a deep breath and re-read it.

Fortunately for us (Americans), we (American citizens) live in a Republic not a Democracy.
...

The interesting thing here is that this "new" system you describe sounds much like a true democracy -- a system our (Americans) forefathers studied enough to know it wouldnt work.

Now in your minds eye, imagine that we were having this as an in person conversation. I could say exactly the same thing (pronouns and all) and youd not assume that Im making assumptions, so why now? Actually, dont answer that -- its probably time this thread either gets back on topic or drops into the archives forever.

To that end... Ill say again: Constitution Party candidate Michael Peroutka
 
Back
Top