The Vista Death Watch

[Bill Yanaire]

Re: The Vista Death Watch


"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhkhq0$j8g$2@aioe.org...
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>> change to suit your preferences.
>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>
>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or bottom
>> posting.
>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a problem
>> with posting methods.
>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such as
>> yourself.
>>
>
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will continue
> to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom posting is the
> only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability to understand that
> notwithstanding.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS products
> so your theory is false.

Translation: Alias doesn't have any respect for others because you keep
posting about Ubuntu when others tell you it isn't appropriate here. You
expect people to stop top posting. People expect you to stop preaching
Ubuntu.

Get over it.

>
> Alias

 

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

"Translation"
That may be part of your problem.
Instead of attempting to translate to whatever interpretation suits
your agenda, simply read what is written.

"Bottom posting is the only acceptable"
Not at all, top and bottom posting are fully acceptable in these
Microsoft newsgroups.
Your inability to accept that fact is only your limitation.
Of course if you can point to where Microsoft states bottom posting is
expected in the Microsoft newsgroups.
But I have asked you that before and you were strangely silent.

"so your theory is false."
I gave no theory.
Possibly another incorrect "Translation".

It seems you are unable to get past criticisms and deal with the
issues at hand.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
news:fhkhq0$j8g$2@aioe.org...
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your
> inability to understand that notwithstanding.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
> products so your theory is false.
>
> Alias

 

[NoStop]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Alias wrote:

> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>> change to suit your preferences.
>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>
>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or bottom
>> posting.
>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a problem
>> with posting methods.
>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such as
>> yourself.
>>
>
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability
> to understand that notwithstanding.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
> products so your theory is false.
>
> Alias

JJ's problem is that he's into the MickeyMouse mindset which states: "take
any sort of standard developed in the computer world, ignore that standard
and replace with a MickeyMouse "standard" that effectively breaks the
norm."

We see this ALL the time when it comes to MickeyMouse and is another reason
that people are getting fed up with MickeyMouse.

Usenet has been around a long time and has developed standards. Trust
MickeyMouse and its fan boys to continually try and break those standards.
They are simply pathetic.

Cheers.

--
Remove Vista Activation Completely ...
http://tinyurl.com/2w8qqo

Frank - seek help immediately! Visit ...
http://www.binsa.org/

 

[NoStop]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

> "Translation"
> That may be part of your problem.
> Instead of attempting to translate to whatever interpretation suits
> your agenda, simply read what is written.
>
> "Bottom posting is the only acceptable"
> Not at all, top and bottom posting are fully acceptable in these
> Microsoft newsgroups.
> Your inability to accept that fact is only your limitation.
> Of course if you can point to where Microsoft states bottom posting is
> expected in the Microsoft newsgroups.
> But I have asked you that before and you were strangely silent.
>
> "so your theory is false."
> I gave no theory.
> Possibly another incorrect "Translation".
>
> It seems you are unable to get past criticisms and deal with the
> issues at hand.
>

Hey numbnuts, the vaste majority of people around here access this ng
through Usenet, not through MickeyMouse's servers. Don't you think it's
time that you accepted that fact and acted accordingly and followed Usenet
standards? You MickeyMouse fan boys have no regard at all to anyone but
yourselves. It's part of the pompous MickeyMouse attitudes you MVP have
become infamous for.

Cheers.

--
Remove Vista Activation Completely ...
http://tinyurl.com/2w8qqo

Frank - seek help immediately! Visit ...
http://www.binsa.org/

 

[Frank]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Alias wrote:
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>
>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>> change to suit your preferences.
>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>
>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or
>> bottom posting.
>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a
>> problem with posting methods.
>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such
>> as yourself.
>>
>
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability
> to understand that notwithstanding.

Translation; alias didn't get his way so blusters, insults and lies
about it.
As for not having any respect for others, you are the prime example of
just such a person. Your very presence in this MS Vista ng promoting
your childish toy os is insulting and disrespectful to everyone here.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
> products so your theory is false.

You always have trouble with the truth don't you. Why not leave if you
don't like it? You don't use Vista, don't have it, can't afford it and
hate it. So leave. You'll be much happier over at the open sores ng's.
Frank

 

[The poster formely known as 'The Poster Formerly K]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Ace wrote:
> You forgot Vista Enterprise.
> It doesn't show on the list with versions on the Microsoft website, but I
> do have the official disc in front of me here.
> It was also the only version offered for my organisation (a public
> college) through the company that organises and distributes software for
> us.
>

And Vista 32 and Vista 64 and Vista N and Vista K...

> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in
> news:Or99rqBKIHA.5224@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>
>> "there are too many versions"
>> 4 - XP Home, XP Pro, XP Tablet PC and XP Media Center
>> There are also 4 with windows Vista, Home Basic, Home Premium,
>> Business and Ultimate.
>> There are others in Windows XP and Windows Vista, but they are not
>> applicable to most users.


--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -
Submit your nomination at the link below:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on
free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the
creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer
rights in the digital age are not frivolous."
- Maura Corbett

 

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Not forgotten at all.
32 and 64 are essentially the same and both were available with
windows XP.
The typical purchaser has little concern for these if purchasing a
computer and 32 bit and 64 bit are included with the retail price of
Home Basic, Home Premium, Business and Ultimate:
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/vistaget.htm

If you look at it as someone experienced, the choice is relatively
simple.
Those less experienced will most probably purchase a computer with
appropriate specifications based on their research and salespersons
help.

Choice is good since it gives consumers more flexibility in choosing
what best meets their needs while not paying for features not desired.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"The poster formely known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina
DiBoy'" <none@none.not> wrote in message news:fhkns0$71j$1@aioe.org...
> Ace wrote:
>> You forgot Vista Enterprise.
>> It doesn't show on the list with versions on the Microsoft website,
>> but I do have the official disc in front of me here.
>> It was also the only version offered for my organisation (a public
>> college) through the company that organises and distributes
>> software for us.
>>
>
> And Vista 32 and Vista 64 and Vista N and Vista K...
>
>> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in
>> news:Or99rqBKIHA.5224@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> "there are too many versions"
>>> 4 - XP Home, XP Pro, XP Tablet PC and XP Media Center
>>> There are also 4 with windows Vista, Home Basic, Home Premium,
>>> Business and Ultimate.
>>> There are others in Windows XP and Windows Vista, but they are
>>> not applicable to most users.
>
>
> --
> Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -
> Submit your nomination at the link below:
> http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html
>
> "Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on
> free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of
> the creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country.
> Consumer rights in the digital age are not frivolous."
> - Maura Corbett

 

[Alias]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Bill Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhkhq0$j8g$2@aioe.org...
>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>>> change to suit your preferences.
>>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>>
>>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or bottom
>>> posting.
>>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a problem
>>> with posting methods.
>>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such as
>>> yourself.
>>>
>> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will continue
>> to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom posting is the
>> only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability to understand that
>> notwithstanding.
>>
>> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS products
>> so your theory is false.
>
> Translation: Alias doesn't have any respect for others because you keep
> posting about Ubuntu when others tell you it isn't appropriate here. You
> expect people to stop top posting. People expect you to stop preaching
> Ubuntu.

Ubuntu is completely on topic as it is the natural alternative for those
who are frustrated with the Vista virus. No one here is the moderator so
what others say others should do is not relevant.

Alias

 

[forty-nine]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmmlc$igf$1@aioe.org...
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fhkhq0$j8g$2@aioe.org...
>>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>>>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>>>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>>>> change to suit your preferences.
>>>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can
>>>> do.
>>>>
>>>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or
>>>> bottom posting.
>>>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>>>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a
>>>> problem with posting methods.
>>>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>>>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such
>>>> as yourself.
>>>>
>>> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
>>> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
>>> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability
>>> to understand that notwithstanding.
>>>
>>> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
>>> products so your theory is false.
>>
>> Translation: Alias doesn't have any respect for others because you keep
>> posting about Ubuntu when others tell you it isn't appropriate here. You
>> expect people to stop top posting. People expect you to stop preaching
>> Ubuntu.
>
> Ubuntu is completely on topic as it is the natural alternative for those
> who are frustrated with the Vista virus. No one here is the moderator so
> what others say others should do is not relevant.
>
> Alias


ubuntu is for dweebs.
ubuntu is an alternative for boredom
but if it makes you feel "revolutionary"...go for it.
it would truly be a revolution if for once some linux twerp could just use
linsux without feeling a need to bother the rest of the world.

 

[Frank]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Alias wrote:


> Ubuntu is completely on topic as it is the natural alternative for those
> who are frustrated with the Vista virus. No one here is the moderator so
> what others say others should do is not relevant.
>
> Alias

Bullsh*t! You are just a fukkin troll! We all know it. You don't have
the balls to face up to it. You are a liar, a loser and a linux lovin
POS troll.
Frank

 

[Alias]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>
>> Ubuntu is completely on topic as it is the natural alternative for
>> those who are frustrated with the Vista virus. No one here is the
>> moderator so what others say others should do is not relevant.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Bullsh*t! You are just a fukkin troll! We all know it. You don't have
> the balls to face up to it. You are a liar, a loser and a linux lovin
> POS troll.
> Frank

Do you honestly think I am affected by your stalking, insults, bluster
and lies? LOL! Ubuntu is much better than the Vista virus will ever be
and you're the troll and liar of the newsgroup.

Alias

 

[Frank]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ubuntu is completely on topic as it is the natural alternative for
>>> those who are frustrated with the Vista virus. No one here is the
>>> moderator so what others say others should do is not relevant.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Bullsh*t! You are just a fukkin troll! We all know it. You don't have
>> the balls to face up to it. You are a liar, a loser and a linux lovin
>> POS troll.
>> Frank
>
>
> Do you honestly think I am affected by your stalking, insults, bluster
> and lies? LOL! Ubuntu is much better than the Vista virus will ever be
> and you're the troll and liar of the newsgroup.
>
> Alias

Oh I know I really bother you. I've outed you as the liar you are and
this entire ng knows it. You pursued a course of lying in this ng and I
caught you doing it. Then you compounded your own problems by trying,
unsuccessfully, to lie your way out of your previous lies. Problem was
and still is, your lies are in writing, for all to see, which they have
done and continue to do.
You been asked to leave this ng with your linux trolling bs, which you
did once, saying you wouldn't return, but that just turned out to be
another one of your fukkin lies.
You're a balless, spineless, clueless, characterless little sawed off
runt of as*hole liar.
Do us all a favor and get lost for good.
Frank

 

[Alias]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu is completely on topic as it is the natural alternative for
>>>> those who are frustrated with the Vista virus. No one here is the
>>>> moderator so what others say others should do is not relevant.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Bullsh*t! You are just a fukkin troll! We all know it. You don't have
>>> the balls to face up to it. You are a liar, a loser and a linux lovin
>>> POS troll.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Do you honestly think I am affected by your stalking, insults, bluster
>> and lies? LOL! Ubuntu is much better than the Vista virus will ever be
>> and you're the troll and liar of the newsgroup.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Oh I know I really bother you.

Stalkers usually like to bother people. Unfortunately for you, you amuse
me occasionally and nothing more.

Alias

 

[Frank]

Re: The Vista Death Watch

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Ubuntu is completely on topic as it is the natural alternative for
>>>>> those who are frustrated with the Vista virus. No one here is the
>>>>> moderator so what others say others should do is not relevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bullsh*t! You are just a fukkin troll! We all know it. You don't
>>>> have the balls to face up to it. You are a liar, a loser and a linux
>>>> lovin POS troll.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you honestly think I am affected by your stalking, insults,
>>> bluster and lies? LOL! Ubuntu is much better than the Vista virus
>>> will ever be and you're the troll and liar of the newsgroup.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Oh I know I really bother you.
>
>
> Stalkers usually like to bother people. Unfortunately for you, you amuse
> me occasionally and nothing more.
>
> Alias


What's wrong mr liar? Can't stand the heat in the kitchen? Then get out
you linux lovin lying troll!
Frank