Thanks for Google Earth for 98!

  • Thread starter Thread starter someone watching
  • Start date Start date
Re: Thanks for Google Earth for 98!


"PCR" <pcrrcp@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:%23XQJImIuIHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Rick Chauvin wrote:
> | "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message
> | news:OW9PTfDuIHA.5268@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl
> |> It would appear that lots of posts are getting filtered from the MS
> |> servers for odd words, who knows why. But how far off was your date?
> |> MS doesn't keep messages for more than a few months. For instance,
> |> it would appear that the oldest posts on the MS server are from the
> |> morning of 2/17/08, which happens to be exactly three months ago. I
> |> suspect any post that is farther than three months from present,
> |> past or future, gets deleted.
> |
> | I'm sure that was probably it Gary.
> | Yes my month was off by 4 months one day after I adj my time and
> | musta hit the wrong button.
> |
> | It wasn't an important post though!
> | It's just the point I messed up with it is all.
> |
> | I just took a screenshot of the post layout in that thread as I see
> | it in OE, and where my post is.
> | http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/9869/98eu1.jpg
> |
> | ...Heck not that it matters since that post is not active anyone, but
> | for GP I will reply to my own message in that post right now to get
> | it to show up, if it isn't already of which I'll embarrass myself
> | more if it is o:) Hey, I just didn't want PCR thinking that I ever
> | ignore him :)
>
> I wouldn't think that of you, Chauvin. That post showed up for me today
> & I responded to it. Despite what I see in your .jpg (9/1/08), it shows



So then it's true, even though I can see my old post I made back then, you
all never saw it because my date was wrong and the servers didn't propagate
it, well that's an interesting tidbit. I had wondered why no one responded
to my post when I had made it - and so now I know.

Have a good day,

Rick




> up dated today's date, (but yea the thread is old)...
>
> From: "Rick Chauvin" <justask@nospamz.com>
> Subject: Re: Bootup - Shutdown logger
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 12:37:35 -0500
>
> | Rick
> |
> |>
> |> --
> |> Gary S. Terhune
> |> MS-MVP Shell/User
> |> www.grystmill.com
> |>
> |>
> |> "Rick Chauvin" <justask@nospamz.com> wrote in message
> |> news:O7ulKWCuIHA.5832@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> |>>
> |>> Thanks PCR... and the same to you.
> |>>
> |>> Rick
> |>>
> |>> ps,
> |>> I replied to one of your posts on thread (Bootup - Shutdown logger)
> |>> I noticed aferwards, and I think because my date stamp was off that
> |>> day you
> |>> all never saw my post? ..if so perhaps the populating server
> |>> filters wrong
> |>> date posts; I can still see it though.
>
> --
> Thanks or Good Luck,
> There may be humor in this post, and,
> Naturally, you will not sue,
> Should things get worse after this,
> PCR
> pcrrcp@netzero.net
>
>
 
Re: Thanks for Google Earth for 98!

Rick Chauvin wrote:
| "PCR" <pcrrcp@netzero.net> wrote in message
| news:%23XQJImIuIHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
|> Rick Chauvin wrote:
|> | "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message
|> | news:OW9PTfDuIHA.5268@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl
|> |> It would appear that lots of posts are getting filtered from the
|> |> MS servers for odd words, who knows why. But how far off was your
|> |> date? MS doesn't keep messages for more than a few months. For
|> |> instance, it would appear that the oldest posts on the MS server
|> |> are from the morning of 2/17/08, which happens to be exactly
|> |> three months ago. I suspect any post that is farther than three
|> |> months from present, past or future, gets deleted.
|> |
|> | I'm sure that was probably it Gary.
|> | Yes my month was off by 4 months one day after I adj my time and
|> | musta hit the wrong button.
|> |
|> | It wasn't an important post though!
|> | It's just the point I messed up with it is all.
|> |
|> | I just took a screenshot of the post layout in that thread as I see
|> | it in OE, and where my post is.
|> | http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/9869/98eu1.jpg
|> |
|> | ...Heck not that it matters since that post is not active anyone,
|> | but for GP I will reply to my own message in that post right now
|> | to get it to show up, if it isn't already of which I'll embarrass
|> | myself more if it is o:) Hey, I just didn't want PCR thinking that
|> | I ever ignore him :)
|>
|> I wouldn't think that of you, Chauvin. That post showed up for me
|> today & I responded to it. Despite what I see in your .jpg (9/1/08),
|> it shows
|
|
| So then it's true, even though I can see my old post I made back
| then, you all never saw it because my date was wrong and the servers
| didn't propagate it, well that's an interesting tidbit. I had
| wondered why no one responded to my post when I had made it - and so
| now I know.

I vaguely recall long ago someone else here in this NG discovered date
has to be within a certain range for a post to show up. Possibly it
coincides with how long MS will keep a post at the server-- which I have
reason to believe is 3 months. That seems to be the range of what I've
got in a recently reset OE. If your post was dated 3 months too old,
likely it never would show. But it was 4 months into the future-- so, we
had to wait one month to see it!

Odd, it seems to be dated 5/17/08 (both sent & received) in OE-- but
your .jpg is showing one date of 9/1/08. The post it attaches to is
correctly dated at 4/30/08 in your .jpg.

| Have a good day,

You too, Chauvin.

| Rick
|
|
|
|
|> up dated today's date, (but yea the thread is old)...
|>
|> From: "Rick Chauvin" <justask@nospamz.com>
|> Subject: Re: Bootup - Shutdown logger
|> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 12:37:35 -0500
|>
|> | Rick
|> |
|> |>
|> |> --
|> |> Gary S. Terhune
|> |> MS-MVP Shell/User
|> |> www.grystmill.com
|> |>
|> |>
|> |> "Rick Chauvin" <justask@nospamz.com> wrote in message
|> |> news:O7ulKWCuIHA.5832@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
|> |>>
|> |>> Thanks PCR... and the same to you.
|> |>>
|> |>> Rick
|> |>>
|> |>> ps,
|> |>> I replied to one of your posts on thread (Bootup - Shutdown
|> |>> logger) I noticed aferwards, and I think because my date stamp
|> |>> was off that day you
|> |>> all never saw my post? ..if so perhaps the populating server
|> |>> filters wrong
|> |>> date posts; I can still see it though.
|>
|> --
|> Thanks or Good Luck,
|> There may be humor in this post, and,
|> Naturally, you will not sue,
|> Should things get worse after this,
|> PCR
|> pcrrcp@netzero.net

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
Should things get worse after this,
PCR
pcrrcp@netzero.net
 
Re: Thanks for Google Earth for 98!

You only see the one post in my screenshot because I took it just Before I
posted that second time there with that reply to myself - and so actually I
should of taken the screenshot after I posted that reply to myself, but
that's not the way it happened.. I see them both, and I could take another
screenshot if you wanted, but it's no biggy I'm sure..

You always thinkin... that's good.

Rick
 
Re: Thanks for Google Earth for 98!

Rick Chauvin wrote:
| You only see the one post in my screenshot because I took it just
| Before I posted that second time there with that reply to myself -
| and so actually I should of taken the screenshot after I posted that
| reply to myself, but that's not the way it happened.. I see them
| both, and I could take another screenshot if you wanted, but it's no
| biggy I'm sure..

I see. So, you posted a second one with a correct date. Then, the first
never would show up, either-- no matter it is post-dated, instead of
pre-dated, beyond the 3 month limit at the MS news server? I guess you
are seeing it at a different news server for this NG.

| You always thinkin... that's good.

Thanks for the opinion. You -- for sure -- Chauvin, are always a
thinker.

| Rick

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
Should things get worse after this,
PCR
pcrrcp@netzero.net
 
Back
Top