Windows Vista Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a l

[Ringmaster]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:22:10 -0400, the <the@the.com> wrote:

>Ringmaster wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:46:17 -0600, "Not Me" <cargod01@bresnan.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> That said, I have yet to see one real benefit to using Vista.
>>> I used it throughout Beta, I use it a couple hours every day; but I am
>>> always glad when it's time to go to MY machine, XP Pro and all.
>>> I have 6 computers in one room downstairs for the kids (age 7-15) and their
>>> friends to use.
>>> They all have their own myspace pages, facebook, etc etc and have been using
>>> computers since they could run the mouse.
>>> One machine has Vista, the other five have XP.
>>> Guess which one sits idle unless the others are all busy?
>>> Even then they fight over who HAS TO use it.
>>> They would rather use the Celeron 1.3Ghz/512MB/XPH than the C2D
>>> 2.66Ghz/3GB/VHP.
>>> That tells ME a lot about Vista's design.
>>
>> You can tell a lot about a company in HOW they test their products.
>> Major corporations tend to run double blind studies and those doing
>> the testing are picked from a pool with the testers having absolutely
>> no idea who they will be and having no input on who's picked. The
>> selection process often being done by some outside firm to guard
>> against bias and loading the deck with flunkies sure to always give a
>> thumbs-up no matter what.
>
>This is absolute garbage:
>
>1) You know nothing about development testing.
>2) You know nothing about quality assurance testing by quality assurance
> testers.
>3) You know nothing about a unit test plan.
>4) You know nothing about a quality assurance test plan.
>5) You know nothing about user quality testing.
>6) You know nothing about a user test plan.
>
>You know nothing about testing any software in a corporation.
>
>You're smoke out of your a-hole here and you need to keep you ignorant
>mouth shut.

Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.

 

[the]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Ringmaster wrote:
>
> Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.

Facts you a-hole? Fanboy out of your stupid mouth you a-hole? You know
nothing about a software testing life cycle in a corporation, and you're
blowing hot smoke out the side of your head and a-hole concerning it too.

 

[Alias]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:04:13 -0500, Ringmaster wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:22:10 -0400, the <the@the.com> wrote:
>
>>Ringmaster wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:46:17 -0600, "Not Me" <cargod01@bresnan.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> That said, I have yet to see one real benefit to using Vista. I used
>>>> it throughout Beta, I use it a couple hours every day; but I am
>>>> always glad when it's time to go to MY machine, XP Pro and all. I
>>>> have 6 computers in one room downstairs for the kids (age 7-15) and
>>>> their friends to use.
>>>> They all have their own myspace pages, facebook, etc etc and have
>>>> been using computers since they could run the mouse. One machine has
>>>> Vista, the other five have XP. Guess which one sits idle unless the
>>>> others are all busy? Even then they fight over who HAS TO use it.
>>>> They would rather use the Celeron 1.3Ghz/512MB/XPH than the C2D
>>>> 2.66Ghz/3GB/VHP.
>>>> That tells ME a lot about Vista's design.
>>>
>>> You can tell a lot about a company in HOW they test their products.
>>> Major corporations tend to run double blind studies and those doing
>>> the testing are picked from a pool with the testers having absolutely
>>> no idea who they will be and having no input on who's picked. The
>>> selection process often being done by some outside firm to guard
>>> against bias and loading the deck with flunkies sure to always give a
>>> thumbs-up no matter what.
>>
>>This is absolute garbage:
>>
>>1) You know nothing about development testing. 2) You know nothing about
>>quality assurance testing by quality assurance
>> testers.
>>3) You know nothing about a unit test plan. 4) You know nothing about a
>>quality assurance test plan. 5) You know nothing about user quality
>>testing. 6) You know nothing about a user test plan.
>>
>>You know nothing about testing any software in a corporation.
>>
>>You're smoke out of your a-hole here and you need to keep you ignorant
>>mouth shut.
>
> Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.

I think that "the" is a Frank the Wank fanboy.

Alias

 

[Alias]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:15:35 -0400, the wrote:

> Ringmaster wrote:
>>
>> Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.
>
> Facts you a-hole? Fanboy out of your stupid mouth you a-hole? You know
> nothing about a software testing life cycle in a corporation, and you're
> blowing hot smoke out the side of your head and a-hole concerning it
> too.

Another one who thinks that insulting people is a valid argument. Are you
Frank's son or daughter?

Alias

 

[Ringmaster]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:15:35 -0400, the <the@the.com> wrote:

>Ringmaster wrote:
>>
>> Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.
>
>Facts you a-hole? Fanboy out of your stupid mouth you a-hole? You know
>nothing about a software testing life cycle in a corporation, and you're
>blowing hot smoke out the side of your head and a-hole concerning it too.

Damn you're stupid. See ===> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.255.24.131 it
gives away which idiot this is under another new name.

ROTFLMAO!

 

[FB]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Not Me wrote:

> "FB" <fb@npam.img> wrote in message
> news:e9VhThH5IHA.776@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
>>Not Me wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"FB" <fb@npam.img> wrote in message
>>>news:%23nJOwkF5IHA.3804@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Not Me wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Making stupid statements leads me to believe that you're unable to deal
>>>>>>with the changes from XP to Vista so you're very frustrated.
>>>>>>Understandable. Some people don't like change and some don't react very
>>>>>>well to it. You can't blame that on Vista.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I have seen many, many changes in a lot of different OS since I started
>>>>>using computers in 1969.
>>>>>Change isn't the issue, function is.
>>>>>I can make Vista function, I just don't like the way it functions.
>>>>
>>>>Well, my experience with electronics/computers predates yours (1961)
>>>>and I have no problem with how Vista functions and I like the way it
>>>>functions.
>>>>Occasionally going back to XP always validates my choice, and Vista is
>>>>clearly superior to XP in every way, as least for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm glad you like it, I don't.
>>>Isn't it grand to have choices.
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>
>>>The choice of an OS is largely based on ones OPINION of that OS.
>>>Too many people confuse OPINION with FACT.
>>
>>Yep!
>>
>>
>>>The fact that you like it doesn't make it a good OS, except in your
>>>opinion.
>>>Opinions can be like rectums...everyone has one and there is always
>>>someone who thinks theirs doesn't stink!
>>
>>Yep!
>>
>>
>>>I have done the Beta of every consumer Windows since W95,...
>>
>>So have I.
>>
>>
>>this one just hits me totally wrong.
>>
>>Well, when I loaded the first Longhorn beta I said to myself..."so what is
>>the point"?
>>Eventually, after working with it, I got the point. Vista is much better
>>and much more capable OS than XP is or can ever be.
>>
>> While I haven't coded myself in many years, I think I know poorly written
>>
>>>code when I use it.
>>>Vista is a huge OS, but that doesn't excuse the poor implementation of
>>>some good ideas.
>>
>>Most of the initial glaring bugs have been resolved by updates and SP1,
>>just like they did with XP, remember?
>>
>>
>>>In my opinion, it's Microsoft's version of the Edsel.
>>
>>Sorry, but I couldn't disagree more. But like you said, it's only your
>>opinion.
>>To me Vista is without a doubt the very best OS MS has ever released and
>>most definitely, the best OS available today for the desktop.
>
>
> Yes, many of the bugs have been resolved by the SP, but what can Vista
> actually do that XP can't?

Natively handles graphics much better and much faster than XP ever could.
Just one of it's many capabilities not found in XP.

> IMHO, things are not where they belong (based on intuitive use, not MS idea
> of where things should be, probably based on having a few people come in and
> use a machine to see where they look for things) and it takes at least
> triple the hardware capability to run anywhere near as well.

Things aren't where they use to be nor where you want them to be.

> I don't buy into the claims that Vista is more secure, I don't have security
> issues with XP.

Sorry, but Vista is natively much more secure than XP could ever be.

> That said, I have yet to see one real benefit to using Vista.

Then you haven't really put it thru it paces in a productive environment
on a daily basis.

> I used it throughout Beta, I use it a couple hours every day; but I am
> always glad when it's time to go to MY machine, XP Pro and all.

I only boot into the 4 XP installs (3 MCE2005's & 1 XP PRO X64) to do
periodic updates. Otherwise, they're are never used.

> I have 6 computers in one room downstairs for the kids (age 7-15) and their
> friends to use.
> They all have their own myspace pages, facebook, etc etc and have been using
> computers since they could run the mouse.
> One machine has Vista, the other five have XP.
> Guess which one sits idle unless the others are all busy?
> Even then they fight over who HAS TO use it.
> They would rather use the Celeron 1.3Ghz/512MB/XPH than the C2D
> 2.66Ghz/3GB/VHP.

> That tells ME a lot about Vista's design.

It is a big myth that teens and tweens are computer wizards by simple
osmoses.
They too must learn.

 

[DanS]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

Alias <fbis@troll.grade.sch> wrote in news:g5d984$bv9$3@aioe.org:

> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:15:35 -0400, the wrote:
>
>> Ringmaster wrote:
>>>
>>> Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.
>>
>> Facts you a-hole? Fanboy out of your stupid mouth you a-hole? You
>> know nothing about a software testing life cycle in a corporation,
>> and you're blowing hot smoke out the side of your head and a-hole
>> concerning it too.
>
> Another one who thinks that insulting people is a valid argument. Are
> you Frank's son or daughter?

No, it's Mr. Arnold, aka idaspud, The Spanish Mongoose, RingMonster,
Defense Lawyer, Dan S-illy aka Barney Phife, *Alias* Gone Wild, Kotex Queen
Clear Windows, Ringmaster the Albright Clown, and, Van Helsing the Albright
Hunter.

And that's only going back to July 1.

 

[FB]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Ringmaster wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:15:35 -0400, the <the@the.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Ringmaster wrote:
>>
>>>Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.
>>
>>Facts you a-hole? Fanboy out of your stupid mouth you a-hole? You know
>>nothing about a software testing life cycle in a corporation, and you're
>>blowing hot smoke out the side of your head and a-hole concerning it too.
>
>
> Damn you're stupid. See ===> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.255.24.131 it
> gives away which idiot this is under another new name.
>
> ROTFLMAO!

And you are adam albright, executioner, ringmaster, gotemeyer and how
many more names huh, you stupid dumb idiot drunken lying pig?

And you're rolling on the floor like the drunken fool you are!...LOL!

 

[FB]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Alias wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:04:13 -0500, Ringmaster wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:22:10 -0400, the <the@the.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ringmaster wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:46:17 -0600, "Not Me" <cargod01@bresnan.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>That said, I have yet to see one real benefit to using Vista. I used
>>>>>it throughout Beta, I use it a couple hours every day; but I am
>>>>>always glad when it's time to go to MY machine, XP Pro and all. I
>>>>>have 6 computers in one room downstairs for the kids (age 7-15) and
>>>>>their friends to use.
>>>>>They all have their own myspace pages, facebook, etc etc and have
>>>>>been using computers since they could run the mouse. One machine has
>>>>>Vista, the other five have XP. Guess which one sits idle unless the
>>>>>others are all busy? Even then they fight over who HAS TO use it.
>>>>>They would rather use the Celeron 1.3Ghz/512MB/XPH than the C2D
>>>>>2.66Ghz/3GB/VHP.
>>>>>That tells ME a lot about Vista's design.
>>>>
>>>>You can tell a lot about a company in HOW they test their products.
>>>>Major corporations tend to run double blind studies and those doing
>>>>the testing are picked from a pool with the testers having absolutely
>>>>no idea who they will be and having no input on who's picked. The
>>>>selection process often being done by some outside firm to guard
>>>>against bias and loading the deck with flunkies sure to always give a
>>>>thumbs-up no matter what.
>>>
>>>This is absolute garbage:
>>>
>>>1) You know nothing about development testing. 2) You know nothing about
>>>quality assurance testing by quality assurance
>>> testers.
>>>3) You know nothing about a unit test plan. 4) You know nothing about a
>>>quality assurance test plan. 5) You know nothing about user quality
>>>testing. 6) You know nothing about a user test plan.
>>>
>>>You know nothing about testing any software in a corporation.
>>>
>>>You're smoke out of your a-hole here and you need to keep you ignorant
>>>mouth shut.
>>
>>Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.
>
>
> I think that "the" is a Frank the Wank fanboy.
>
> Alias
>

"Think", is your real problem sheep-fukker. Give it up cause it ain't
working.

 

[Alias]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:37:04 +0000, DanS wrote:

> Alias <fbis@troll.grade.sch> wrote in news:g5d984$bv9$3@aioe.org:
>
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:15:35 -0400, the wrote:
>>
>>> Ringmaster wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Typical MS fanboy response to facts, lie about the poster.
>>>
>>> Facts you a-hole? Fanboy out of your stupid mouth you a-hole? You know
>>> nothing about a software testing life cycle in a corporation, and
>>> you're blowing hot smoke out the side of your head and a-hole
>>> concerning it too.
>>
>> Another one who thinks that insulting people is a valid argument. Are
>> you Frank's son or daughter?
>
> No, it's Mr. Arnold, aka idaspud, The Spanish Mongoose, RingMonster,
> Defense Lawyer, Dan S-illy aka Barney Phife, *Alias* Gone Wild, Kotex
> Queen Clear Windows, Ringmaster the Albright Clown, and, Van Helsing the
> Albright Hunter.
>
> And that's only going back to July 1.

LOL!

Alias

 

[the]

Re: Stupid Ringmaster a *clown*..

Re: Stupid Ringmaster a *clown*..

Ringmaster wrote:

You stupid clown, go look at the posting host IP now you a-hole. But you
stupid idiot, can you see the beauty of the disconnect or
dis-association, which you can't achieve? <G>

 

[Ringmaster]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:23:57 -0700, FB <fb@npam.img> wrote:


>> I don't buy into the claims that Vista is more secure, I don't have security
>> issues with XP.
>
>Sorry, but Vista is natively much more secure than XP could ever be.

Ok, Frank, here's your big chance to show you're not just a stupid
putz flapping his gums. Explain in detail HOW Vista is more secure
than XP. Tell us now, in your own words. I'm listening.
>
>is a big myth that teens and tweens are computer wizards by simple
>osmoses.
>They too must learn.

Too bad an old fart like you Frank never learns what a a-hole he's
seen as.

 

[the]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Ringmaster wrote:

> Too bad an old fart like you Frank never learns what a a-hole he's
> seen as.

He's got you for comparison.

 

[FB]

Re: Stupid Ringmaster a *clown*..

Re: Stupid Ringmaster a *clown*..

the wrote:

> Ringmaster wrote:
>
> You stupid clown, go look at the posting host IP now you a-hole. But you
> stupid idiot, can you see the beauty of the disconnect or
> dis-association, which you can't achieve? <G>

adam is the genius (re: idiot!) who was willing to bet his life on the
fact that I was a student at SDSU based on his (in)ability to read a
header!...LOL!
I just love watching this drunken lying loser make a complete and utter
fool out of himself on a daily basis.
He is truly our resident idiot and fool that everyone hates yet loves to
laugh at.

 

[fb]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Ringmaster wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:23:57 -0700, FB <fb@npam.img> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I don't buy into the claims that Vista is more secure, I don't have security
>>>issues with XP.
>>
>>Sorry, but Vista is natively much more secure than XP could ever be.
>
>
> Ok, Frank, here's your big chance to show you're not just a stupid
> putz flapping his gums. Explain in detail HOW Vista is more secure
> than XP. Tell us now, in your own words. I'm listening.

Are you sober enough to read and comprehend mr drunken lying pig?

Go here and try read and comprehend. Oh, these are the words of the MS,
the ones who created Vista and the ones who know it better than you or me.
I bet that really fries up your stupid ignorant drunken loser ass
doesn't it!
Read'em and weep you idiot loser fool!

http://download.microsoft.com/downl...d4-b295-dcf69e770a87/WindowsVistaSecurity.doc

>
>>is a big myth that teens and tweens are computer wizards by simple
>>osmoses.
>>They too must learn.
>
>
> Too bad an old fart like you Frank never learns what a a-hole he's
> seen as.

Too bad you can't seem to sober up and get a real life. What are you
going to do when bubba is thru with your sorry ass huh?...LOL!
Loser!

 

[measekite]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.



Ringmaster wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:23:57 -0700, FB <fb@npam.img> wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I don't buy into the claims that Vista is more secure, I don't have security
>>> issues with XP.
>>>
>> Sorry, but Vista is natively much more secure than XP could ever be.
>>
>
> Ok, Frank, here's your big chance to show you're not just a stupid
> putz

Is that like an ushzmuck - a shmuck with ears?
> flapping his gums. Explain in detail HOW Vista is more secure
> than XP. Tell us now, in your own words. I'm listening.
>
>> is a big myth that teens and tweens are computer wizards by simple
>> osmoses.
>> They too must learn.
>>
>
> Too bad an old fart like you Frank never learns what a a-hole he's
> seen as.
>

 

[Ringmaster]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:49:09 -0700, fb <fb@nam.klo> wrote:

>Ringmaster wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:23:57 -0700, FB <fb@npam.img> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I don't buy into the claims that Vista is more secure, I don't have security
>>>>issues with XP.
>>>
>>>Sorry, but Vista is natively much more secure than XP could ever be.
>>
>>
>> Ok, Frank, here's your big chance to show you're not just a stupid
>> putz flapping his gums. Explain in detail HOW Vista is more secure
>> than XP. Tell us now, in your own words. I'm listening.
>
>Are you sober enough to read and comprehend mr drunken lying pig?

You silly old moron Frank, I absolutely knew it is impossible for some
dickhead like you to put four words in a row that are of your own
writing so what does the idiot do? Oh... copy and paste some Microsoft
hype. Priceless!

>> Too bad an old fart like you Frank never learns what a a-hole he's
>> seen as.
>
>Too bad you can't seem to sober up and get a real life. What are you
>going to do when bubba is thru with your sorry ass huh?...LOL!
>Loser!

Still dancing for me Frank, that a boy. You'll get your cookie and
warm milk at the usual time. Remember, you promised to try extra hard
not to soil your PJ's tonight, you don't want to break your old record
of messing yourself 22 nights in a row. Don't forget to ask the nurse
to put the rubber sheet on your bed and you put on double diapers and
nothing to drink after 9:00 PM!

 

[Terminator]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Ringmaster wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:31:46 -0500, Terminator
> <terminator@netscape.com> wrote:
>
>
>> "Ringmaster" is one of those pseudo-intellectuals who thinks he knows
>> all the answers. He has been told many times that most of his issues
>> with Vista are hardware-related. His computer has either a defective
>> motherboard or power supply that is causing his "issues".
>
> Oh yeah, I've been told all kinds of crap by idiots in this newsgroup.
> Ever hear of Google?
>
> Try searching "Vista Problems" 1,290,000 hits and counting.
>
> Now lets apply some simple logic. Either the handful of bubble headed
> buffoons that worship Microsoft and post here are right or all those
> people reporting real problems are right.
>
> Hmmm.... I wonder.
>
> Technical experts from the beginning have been hard on Vista pointing
> out tons of problems.
>
> Technical writers in countless magazines, blogs and forums have ripped
> Vista from one end to another and conducted conclusive tests showing
> Vista is often slower and more sluggish that XP.
>
> Most damning is both Gates and Ballmer ADMIT Vista is flawed and are
> racing to get Windows 7 out.
>
> You were saying?

I was attempting to address your specific issue with Vista
and not generalize as you are so apt to do. Your issue
of sudden occasional stop error messages (blue screens)
and other abnormal behavior is caused either by a defective
power supply unit or motherboard. A hard to diagnosis 'short'
in either device can cause the operating system to blue screen.

I know what I'm talking about because the same thing happened
to one of my computers and the problem was definitely a bad
power supply, even though the unit (Antec)was only a month old.

If you don't want to solve your problem and just continue
to rag Vista, that says volumes about your lack of technical
expertise and unwillingness to follow helpful advice.

To sum up, try a different PSU and see if it solves your problem.
If it doesn't, you can bet your motherboard is the problem.

 

[Hobbes]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. So now, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote Windows Vista? Get a life.


"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:Ertek.28462$co7.6813@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
>
> Ringmaster wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:23:57 -0700, FB <fb@npam.img> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>> I don't buy into the claims that Vista is more secure, I don't have
>>>> security issues with XP.
>>>>
>>> Sorry, but Vista is natively much more secure than XP could ever be.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, Frank, here's your big chance to show you're not just a stupid
>> putz
>
> Is that like an ushzmuck - a shmuck with ears?
>> flapping his gums. Explain in detail HOW Vista is more secure
>> than XP. Tell us now, in your own words. I'm listening.
>>> is a big myth that teens and tweens are computer wizards by simple
>>> osmoses.
>>> They too must learn.
>>>
>>
>> Too bad an old fart like you Frank never learns what a a-hole he's
>> seen as.
>>
>

RingletMaster...better get your shots, ol' measekite is a mangy dog !

 

[Terminator]

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Re: Yesterday's Microsoft marketing bravado is just too funny. Sonow, 17 months after general availability, Microsoft will promote WindowsVista? Get a life.

Ringmaster wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:31:46 -0500, Terminator
> <terminator@netscape.com> wrote:
>
>
>> "Ringmaster" is one of those pseudo-intellectuals who thinks he knows
>> all the answers. He has been told many times that most of his issues
>> with Vista are hardware-related. His computer has either a defective
>> motherboard or power supply that is causing his "issues".
>
> Oh yeah, I've been told all kinds of crap by idiots in this newsgroup.
> Ever hear of Google?
>
> Try searching "Vista Problems" 1,290,000 hits and counting.
>
> Now lets apply some simple logic. Either the handful of bubble headed
> buffoons that worship Microsoft and post here are right or all those
> people reporting real problems are right.
>
> Hmmm.... I wonder.
>
> Technical experts from the beginning have been hard on Vista pointing
> out tons of problems.
>
> Technical writers in countless magazines, blogs and forums have ripped
> Vista from one end to another and conducted conclusive tests showing
> Vista is often slower and more sluggish that XP.
>
> Most damning is both Gates and Ballmer ADMIT Vista is flawed and are
> racing to get Windows 7 out.
>
> You were saying?

P.S. Even Windows 7 is not going to "cure" your hardware issue.
"Racing to get Windows 7 out"? Hardly! It is not planned
for release until late 2009 or early 2010!