Windows Vista Vista is "New Coke"

  • Thread starter Thread starter zuoer
  • Start date Start date
Re: Vista is "New Coke"

measekite wrote:

>
>
> Frank wrote:
>
>> big vista who is an idiot wrote:
>>
>>> I don't work at nor have ever needed a help desk...
>>
>>
>> They fired your dumb ass?
>
> It is obvious that you must have an intimate relationship with it to
> feel that it is not smart.
I bet you wish you really had a brain, don't you?
>
>> Figures!
>>
>>>
>>> You on the other hand cannot work at a help desk because you are a
>>> computer illiterate moron,
>>> and you needed a helpdesk at least on one occasion to get vista to
>>> work...
>>
>>
>> So you do work at a help desk...figures. And sorry butt-munch, but
>> I've never needed a help desk
>
>
> You need a psychiatrist
So what is the name of yours?
>
>> to get Vista to work...you're a fukkin idiot morn loser capin' crunch!
>> You don't have a real life. Your Vista hate campaign
>> failed...miserably...just like you have failed miserably in your
>> pathetic life.
>>
>>>
>>> LOL you are such a moron frank...
>>>
>>> How many times must I tell you?
>>
>>
>> Well bozo, who cares about you or your loser opinion
>
> I do
You wish you had a job at a help desk too?
>
>> , huh?
>> What you say is meaningless..
Meaningless is everything you say.
>
> You have that reversed
>
>> .totally meaningless.
>> I sign on the front of the check, not the back, like you have to.
 
Re: Vista is "New Coke"

So you print fake checks to yourself and send them by mail to yourself huh?
Nothing like make-for-real to keep that delusional schizophrenic mentality
of yours at peak performance!

You are a crazy moron... the best thing that happened to you in your whole
pathetic life
was that I took the time to insult you.




"Frank" <fab@nopam.net> wrote in message news:g6p0f9$aro$1@aioe.org...
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> I sign on the front of the check, not the back, like you have to.
>>
>>
>> Writing a bad check to the supermarket doesn't count, Frank.
>
> It figures that would go right over your little pointy head and you
> wouldn't even have to duck to miss the point.
> Or is that one of the crimes you've committed sheep-fukker? Passing bad
> checks? You are a known and admitted thief.
> But I don't write checks, I just sign them, on the front.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
 
Re: Vista is "New Coke"

fb wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FB wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> Nothing but his usual lies!
>>> Get lost troll!
>>
>>
>> LOL! This from the biggest and most disgusting troll here!
>
> That would be you sheep-fukker!

Tsk, tsk, violating MS posting rules again, eh Troll?

>>
>> Too funny!
>
> Really? You like being laughed at?

I'm laughing at you.

> Figures, seeing as how you're an uneducated idiot moron lying linux POS
> loser!...LOL!

"Figures" and you is an oxymoron.

Alias
 
Re: Vista is "New Coke"

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> I sign on the front of the check, not the back, like you have to.
>>
>>
>> Writing a bad check to the supermarket doesn't count, Frank.
>
> It figures that would go right over your little pointy head and you
> wouldn't even have to duck to miss the point.
> Or is that one of the crimes you've committed sheep-fukker? Passing bad
> checks? You are a known and admitted thief.
> But I don't write checks, I just sign them, on the front.

Sure, Frank, sure.

Alias
 
Re: Vista is "New Coke"

Personal opinions aside, and making no comments about the relative
merits of XP or Vista OS's, the facts are that Corporate America is
not rushing out to replace XP with Vista. Not even Intel, a company
with a fairly cozy relationship with Microsoft.
Intel decided to only allow Vista to be installed on a small number of
their machines; all others will continue to use XP. This was from a
recent a news story in the NYT.
The majority of Vista users are those who found that only Vista was
sold by OEM from whom they bought their new PC's or laptops. That does
not reflect a true choice of the marketplace but rather a reflection
of OEM contractual agreements with Microsoft.
A really superior product does not require blackmail to achieve public
acceptance. A superior product, sold at a reasonable price would be
readily adopted by a customer base whom had never been given any
reason in the past to be suspicious of a giant in it's field who has
burned its customers many time before. In this light, Vista and
Microsoft is no different than any major US automobile building
corporation. Fool me thrice( or more) is not nice. It is enough to
cause potential buyers to have serious reservations.
 
Re: Vista is "New Coke"

apistomaster wrote:

> Personal opinions aside, and making no comments about the relative
> merits of XP or Vista OS's, the facts are that Corporate America is
> not rushing out to replace XP with Vista.

Nor did they rush out to replace 2K with XP.

Not even Intel, a company
> with a fairly cozy relationship with Microsoft.
> Intel decided to only allow Vista to be installed on a small number of
> their machines; all others will continue to use XP. This was from a
> recent a news story in the NYT.

Read the official release from Intel. It's their usual procedure with
all OS's.

> The majority of Vista users are those who found that only Vista was
> sold by OEM from whom they bought their new PC's or laptops.

Not true.

That does
> not reflect a true choice of the marketplace but rather a reflection
> of OEM contractual agreements with Microsoft.

No, it reflects a true market place. Otherwise, sales would come to a
screeching halt. They didn't.

> A really superior product does not require blackmail to achieve public
> acceptance. A superior product, sold at a reasonable price would be
> readily adopted by a customer base whom had never been given any
> reason in the past to be suspicious of a giant in it's field who has
> burned its customers many time before.

Then if linux is a "superior product", and is free, why is it's desk top
adaption only at 1% after almost 15+yrs?

In this light, Vista and
> Microsoft is no different than any major US automobile building
> corporation.

Really?

Fool me thrice( or more) is not nice. It is enough to
> cause potential buyers to have serious reservations.

It's still all about informed buyers and choice. The market speaks for
itself.
 
Re: Vista is "New Coke"


"apistomaster" <apistomaster@clearwire.net> wrote in message
news:f60ff48f-c340-4cea-b146-3975fe4c1f50@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
> Personal opinions aside,

- Except yours right...?

and making no comments about the relative
> merits of XP or Vista OS's, the facts are that Corporate America is
> not rushing out to replace XP with Vista.

- When Vista was still in it's whisper stages, as in nowhere near release,
corporate Australia was saying that there will be no upgrade this side of
the decade. I don't think corporate US had an upgrage in mind either. It's
more to do with business descisions.

>Not even Intel, a company
> with a fairly cozy relationship with Microsoft.
> Intel decided to only allow Vista to be installed on a small number of
> their machines;

- I bet the relationship is still very much cozy.

>all others will continue to use XP. This was from a
> recent a news story in the NYT.

- Ever wondered if the NYT has Vista installs anywhere.....! NYT has no
'truth credibility'.

> The majority of Vista users are those who found that only Vista was
> sold by OEM from whom they bought their new PC's or laptops. That does
> not reflect a true choice of the marketplace but rather a reflection
> of OEM contractual agreements with Microsoft.

- XP was the same, maybe still is.

> A really superior product does not require blackmail to achieve public
> acceptance. A superior product, sold at a reasonable price would be
> readily adopted by a customer base whom had never been given any
> reason in the past to be suspicious of a giant in it's field who has
> burned its customers many time before. In this light, Vista and
> Microsoft is no different than any major US automobile building
> corporation.

- You should do some work in Market Research.

>Fool me thrice( or more) is not nice. It is enough to
> cause potential buyers to have serious reservations.

- Bull...! Now we're back to your person opinion.

- WindPipe
 
Back
Top