G
Gary S. Terhune
Guest
Re: UAC Questions
OK, but just to be clear, your example is not relevant to the OP's desires.
The whole point of UAC isn't to say "OK" to potentially bad programs, it's
to notify you that *something* or *someone* wants to launch the program. The
idea is to get you to ask the question, "What initiated this application?
Was it me? If not, then or who, or what issued the command?" If it isn't
"me" that initiated the program, UAC protocol dictates that I first find out
who or what tried to up the app before I let it continue. And just because
it's OK to run an app one time does not by any means guarantee that the next
time it runs it won't be at the behest of a virus or other malware. Take
Windows Explorer for example. That's one I can see OP adding to the UAC
Ignore List. It's also capable of wiping a lot of data, especially if OP is
already running as Admin. The list is long of legitimate apps that can
destroy your system or your personal data. Or just steal it, whatever.
That's why they put in UAC in the first place (and believe me, I am, shall
we say, ambivalent about the thing.) In the OP's case, using the method you
linked to would be silly. Oughta just turn UAC off.
Now, about that old app of yours. I don't follow. Do you have any idea what
the actual mechanics of the failure to run were? "Run as Administrator"
didn't work?
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
http://grystmill.com
"Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMsyndrome.me.uk> wrote in message
news:uQUSMeB%23IHA.3092@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message
> news:eGX3rLB%23IHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> While I thank you for the link, if you're going to start disabling UAC
>> for anything, you might as well just turn it off.
>
>
> No, not is you are just doing it for particular known applications, as
> described on the page. I've had to use that method to get an old CAD
> application working in Vista.
>
> ss.
>
OK, but just to be clear, your example is not relevant to the OP's desires.
The whole point of UAC isn't to say "OK" to potentially bad programs, it's
to notify you that *something* or *someone* wants to launch the program. The
idea is to get you to ask the question, "What initiated this application?
Was it me? If not, then or who, or what issued the command?" If it isn't
"me" that initiated the program, UAC protocol dictates that I first find out
who or what tried to up the app before I let it continue. And just because
it's OK to run an app one time does not by any means guarantee that the next
time it runs it won't be at the behest of a virus or other malware. Take
Windows Explorer for example. That's one I can see OP adding to the UAC
Ignore List. It's also capable of wiping a lot of data, especially if OP is
already running as Admin. The list is long of legitimate apps that can
destroy your system or your personal data. Or just steal it, whatever.
That's why they put in UAC in the first place (and believe me, I am, shall
we say, ambivalent about the thing.) In the OP's case, using the method you
linked to would be silly. Oughta just turn UAC off.
Now, about that old app of yours. I don't follow. Do you have any idea what
the actual mechanics of the failure to run were? "Run as Administrator"
didn't work?
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
http://grystmill.com
"Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMsyndrome.me.uk> wrote in message
news:uQUSMeB%23IHA.3092@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message
> news:eGX3rLB%23IHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> While I thank you for the link, if you're going to start disabling UAC
>> for anything, you might as well just turn it off.
>
>
> No, not is you are just doing it for particular known applications, as
> described on the page. I've had to use that method to get an old CAD
> application working in Vista.
>
> ss.
>