D
Dan
Guest
Re: IE6 is NOT working, why?
I am with you there Gary and I really do enjoy targetting the individual
machine and trying to cure it. It really is so much simpler if you can fix
the individual machine by being able to sit at that machine and work at that
machine and that is a good reason why I am still a Windows 98 Second Edition
guy at heart because it is so much fun to be able to sit at the machine and
fix the problems right there. I guess that is why 9x is a consumer source
code compared to NT being a business source code because the 2 markets have
different needs. My friend Chris from Camp Stoney in Santa Fe, NM tells me
he plans to build a 98 Second Edition Machine from an old motherboard of mine
and he wants it for old-school gaming. <smile>
That is the coolest thing in my opinion because I am totally an old-school
gamer having grown up with an IBM PCjr in New York City and my first big
adventure game being King's Quest 1 in 1984 by Ken Williams of Sierra-On-Line
that was built to show off the prowess of the IBM PCjr. I have heard from
others in the industry that Amiga was really cool but I never had a chance to
play around with one or a Commodore for that matter.
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> Well my answer to intractable network issues in a single machine is to
> remove ALL of it, just scour the system for anything that has to do with
> networking and remove it, from DM, from Networks folder, make sure the right
> drivers are available and then let it reinstall itself.
>
> But then, it's been so long since I dealt with dial-up on XP I totally
> forget what the dialogues even look like.
>
> --
> Gary S. Terhune
> MS-MVP Shell/User
> http://grystmill.com
>
> "Robert A. Macy" <macy@california.com> wrote in message
> news:d22ecc65-0806-4fd6-82c6-ab75db7e9a37@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 18, 12:01 am, "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote:
> > Me? I had nothing to do with it, I swear. It was that guy over there.
> > Leave
> > me outta this.
>
> Actually, you had the best sequence of things to try. Didn't even
> know those programs exist. Must be someplace to find out the set of
> useful DOS commands, grouped alphabetically and functionally. It
> seemed to me like the other group NEVER really got past making certain
> there was no malware running, that all my antivirus software was
> installed and then turned off. Well maybe not, just seemed like
> that.
>
> > If Windows is taking that long to load, you need to analyze why. Anything
> > that waits for response before continuing, and then given a long list of
> > responses to wait for, like networking. What the heck kind of network do
> > you
> > have, anyway?
>
> Uh, no network at all. All machines are autonomous. Need to take my
> question over to the WinXP group,...shudder.
>
> Oddly, at the same time I was trying to get this WinXP up and onto the
> net, our other three machines stopped logging on promptly, or at all.
> My complaint to our server resulted in about a three day effort
> [including not being available off and on for long periodsof time] for
> them to fix the problem. I think they now have it fixed because the
> two Win98's and the 'good' WinXP all log on in the standard 12 to 20
> seconds of dial, hand shake, verify, and page comes up. But, alas,
> this WinXP is still a dog. Coincidence was strange.
>
> However, I am THOROUGHLY convinced the problem is now unique to this
> WinXP SP2 running too much stuff and upgrades.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
I am with you there Gary and I really do enjoy targetting the individual
machine and trying to cure it. It really is so much simpler if you can fix
the individual machine by being able to sit at that machine and work at that
machine and that is a good reason why I am still a Windows 98 Second Edition
guy at heart because it is so much fun to be able to sit at the machine and
fix the problems right there. I guess that is why 9x is a consumer source
code compared to NT being a business source code because the 2 markets have
different needs. My friend Chris from Camp Stoney in Santa Fe, NM tells me
he plans to build a 98 Second Edition Machine from an old motherboard of mine
and he wants it for old-school gaming. <smile>
That is the coolest thing in my opinion because I am totally an old-school
gamer having grown up with an IBM PCjr in New York City and my first big
adventure game being King's Quest 1 in 1984 by Ken Williams of Sierra-On-Line
that was built to show off the prowess of the IBM PCjr. I have heard from
others in the industry that Amiga was really cool but I never had a chance to
play around with one or a Commodore for that matter.
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> Well my answer to intractable network issues in a single machine is to
> remove ALL of it, just scour the system for anything that has to do with
> networking and remove it, from DM, from Networks folder, make sure the right
> drivers are available and then let it reinstall itself.
>
> But then, it's been so long since I dealt with dial-up on XP I totally
> forget what the dialogues even look like.
>
> --
> Gary S. Terhune
> MS-MVP Shell/User
> http://grystmill.com
>
> "Robert A. Macy" <macy@california.com> wrote in message
> news:d22ecc65-0806-4fd6-82c6-ab75db7e9a37@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 18, 12:01 am, "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote:
> > Me? I had nothing to do with it, I swear. It was that guy over there.
> > Leave
> > me outta this.
>
> Actually, you had the best sequence of things to try. Didn't even
> know those programs exist. Must be someplace to find out the set of
> useful DOS commands, grouped alphabetically and functionally. It
> seemed to me like the other group NEVER really got past making certain
> there was no malware running, that all my antivirus software was
> installed and then turned off. Well maybe not, just seemed like
> that.
>
> > If Windows is taking that long to load, you need to analyze why. Anything
> > that waits for response before continuing, and then given a long list of
> > responses to wait for, like networking. What the heck kind of network do
> > you
> > have, anyway?
>
> Uh, no network at all. All machines are autonomous. Need to take my
> question over to the WinXP group,...shudder.
>
> Oddly, at the same time I was trying to get this WinXP up and onto the
> net, our other three machines stopped logging on promptly, or at all.
> My complaint to our server resulted in about a three day effort
> [including not being available off and on for long periodsof time] for
> them to fix the problem. I think they now have it fixed because the
> two Win98's and the 'good' WinXP all log on in the standard 12 to 20
> seconds of dial, hand shake, verify, and page comes up. But, alas,
> this WinXP is still a dog. Coincidence was strange.
>
> However, I am THOROUGHLY convinced the problem is now unique to this
> WinXP SP2 running too much stuff and upgrades.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Robert
>
>
>