M
MowGreen [MVP]
Guest
Re: .Net Framework V2 Install Corrupts MS Outlook Biz Contact Mgr
JJ,
>>> Why do you think I cannot get a clean install of .NETV2 SP1 and why does it
>>> appear (except in your verification tool) that it installed correctly?
Where to find .NET Framework 2.0 SP1, .NET Framework 3.0 SP1 and .NET
Framework 3.5
setup log files
http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/04/30/8445569.aspx
> Logs produced by the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 setup wrapper:
>
> * %temp%\dd_dotnetfx20install*.txt
> * %temp%\dd_dotnetfx20error*.txt
> * %temp%\dd_depcheck_netfx20*.txt
Strongly suggest you contact Aaron Stebner as he is *the* guru on .NET
installation issues and the author of the verification tool:
http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx
Copy those log files to the Desktop so as to preserve them. Aaron will
request you email them to him.
Hang in there ... I think the improper installation of .NET 2 SP1 is
affecting .NET 1.1, which Outlook requires as a runtime.
MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008]
===============
*-343-* FDNY
Never Forgotten
===============
JJ wrote:
> I cleaned outlook (said it repaired successfully - not sure what/if anything
> was wrong).
>
> I installed .Net V2 SP1 again (used your verification tool again - and it
> referenced the error in the install - again). Rendered Outlook inaccessible
> - again.
>
> Have uninstalled .Net V2 SP1 - again - Outlook OK again.
>
> In previous note - I was wondering if the info from the "depcheck" file in
> the tmp folder held any clues as to why the installs are seemingly - failing.
>
> I also notice that each time I do an uninstall via the add/remove function -
> it still leaves the .exe file in the folder that I have downloaded the appl
> to (I then deleted the .exe file manually).
>
> Why do you think I cannot get a clean install of .NETV2 SP1 and why does it
> appear (except in your verification tool) that it installed correctly? Why
> does what is getting installed - mess up outlook?
>
> I'm sure you are doing all you can to help - do you think we are getting
> closer to a solution? Sure its as frustrating for you as it is for me!
> Thanks for all your continued assistance.
>
>
>
JJ,
>>> Why do you think I cannot get a clean install of .NETV2 SP1 and why does it
>>> appear (except in your verification tool) that it installed correctly?
Where to find .NET Framework 2.0 SP1, .NET Framework 3.0 SP1 and .NET
Framework 3.5
setup log files
http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/04/30/8445569.aspx
> Logs produced by the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 setup wrapper:
>
> * %temp%\dd_dotnetfx20install*.txt
> * %temp%\dd_dotnetfx20error*.txt
> * %temp%\dd_depcheck_netfx20*.txt
Strongly suggest you contact Aaron Stebner as he is *the* guru on .NET
installation issues and the author of the verification tool:
http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx
Copy those log files to the Desktop so as to preserve them. Aaron will
request you email them to him.
Hang in there ... I think the improper installation of .NET 2 SP1 is
affecting .NET 1.1, which Outlook requires as a runtime.
MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008]
===============
*-343-* FDNY
Never Forgotten
===============
JJ wrote:
> I cleaned outlook (said it repaired successfully - not sure what/if anything
> was wrong).
>
> I installed .Net V2 SP1 again (used your verification tool again - and it
> referenced the error in the install - again). Rendered Outlook inaccessible
> - again.
>
> Have uninstalled .Net V2 SP1 - again - Outlook OK again.
>
> In previous note - I was wondering if the info from the "depcheck" file in
> the tmp folder held any clues as to why the installs are seemingly - failing.
>
> I also notice that each time I do an uninstall via the add/remove function -
> it still leaves the .exe file in the folder that I have downloaded the appl
> to (I then deleted the .exe file manually).
>
> Why do you think I cannot get a clean install of .NETV2 SP1 and why does it
> appear (except in your verification tool) that it installed correctly? Why
> does what is getting installed - mess up outlook?
>
> I'm sure you are doing all you can to help - do you think we are getting
> closer to a solution? Sure its as frustrating for you as it is for me!
> Thanks for all your continued assistance.
>
>
>