D
David H. Lipman
Guest
Re: Viruses
From: "ArameFarpado" <a-farpado.spam@netcabo.pt>
| Em Segunda, 22 de Setembro de 2008 23:25, David H. Lipman escreveu:
>> From: "ArameFarpado" <a-farpado.spam@netcabo.pt>
>> | Em Segunda, 22 de Setembro de 2008 22:04, David H. Lipman escreveu:
>>>> as malware
>>>> affects every OS.
>> | Not true.
>> It sure is.
| No.
>> The only thing is some operating systems are targeted more than others.
>> Win32 is the most targeted OS familiy (and we are in the Microsoft Usenet
>> hierarchy)
| almost all huge internet servers runs on unix like OSs, so as big company
| servers... are you thinking this machines are not tempting targets?
| Ms OSs are the most target by malware because it is easy to target them...
| There had been several attempts to create a virus that infect unix like
| systems like they infect windows, and they all failed, because they can
| only workout in badly configured or wrongly used systems.
>> but you name an OS and there is some form of malware for it.
| They can be hacked if they have open ports like all servers have, but can't
| be infected like windows and symbian (nokia phones) can.
| Actualy, these are the two systems that need to be protected by anti-malware
| progs... an MacOS or Linux user will only install an antivirus if he is
| paranoid.
| For windows to get the same level of imunity, it would have to change a lot:
| ---stop identifying file types by its extention's name (weekness)
| ---stop loading bynaries (as programs) by clicking directly on them (extreme
| weekness)
| ---create a new permissions system that really works...
| ---ban the autorun in removable volumes.
| ---does not allow the administrator to have a grafical desktop.
| and this would go on and on...
| the best way to fight the threat of malware is to correct the flaws and
| weekness they exploit... not trusting on anti-malware to solve it...
| anti-malware could be used only as a temporary solution, not a permanet
| one.
| Microsoft did some of these corrections allready (the RPC exploit) but they
| wore not enought
| regards
Attempts at infecteing Unix/Linux didn't fail. They weren't as successful as with Win16
and Win32.
Let see...
There was the Bliss. Remember that ?
Then there is the RST.a/RST.b (aka; ELF.RST.a), Rike, Ramen, Metaphor, Lindoes, Kagob and
the infamous OSF.8759.
We also have the Lion, Kork, Millen and Slapper worms and the Obsidian.
I'm sorry...
There is malware for the 'nix families whether they are configured properly or not, they
exist and there will continue to be new ones created. As the MAC and 'nix OS' become more
prevalent they too will have a larger targeting base.
Even the venerable VM/CMS had its virus holiday in '88 on Christmas < LOL >
Like the Amiga ? It had viruses. It even got Aids < lol >
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: "ArameFarpado" <a-farpado.spam@netcabo.pt>
| Em Segunda, 22 de Setembro de 2008 23:25, David H. Lipman escreveu:
>> From: "ArameFarpado" <a-farpado.spam@netcabo.pt>
>> | Em Segunda, 22 de Setembro de 2008 22:04, David H. Lipman escreveu:
>>>> as malware
>>>> affects every OS.
>> | Not true.
>> It sure is.
| No.
>> The only thing is some operating systems are targeted more than others.
>> Win32 is the most targeted OS familiy (and we are in the Microsoft Usenet
>> hierarchy)
| almost all huge internet servers runs on unix like OSs, so as big company
| servers... are you thinking this machines are not tempting targets?
| Ms OSs are the most target by malware because it is easy to target them...
| There had been several attempts to create a virus that infect unix like
| systems like they infect windows, and they all failed, because they can
| only workout in badly configured or wrongly used systems.
>> but you name an OS and there is some form of malware for it.
| They can be hacked if they have open ports like all servers have, but can't
| be infected like windows and symbian (nokia phones) can.
| Actualy, these are the two systems that need to be protected by anti-malware
| progs... an MacOS or Linux user will only install an antivirus if he is
| paranoid.
| For windows to get the same level of imunity, it would have to change a lot:
| ---stop identifying file types by its extention's name (weekness)
| ---stop loading bynaries (as programs) by clicking directly on them (extreme
| weekness)
| ---create a new permissions system that really works...
| ---ban the autorun in removable volumes.
| ---does not allow the administrator to have a grafical desktop.
| and this would go on and on...
| the best way to fight the threat of malware is to correct the flaws and
| weekness they exploit... not trusting on anti-malware to solve it...
| anti-malware could be used only as a temporary solution, not a permanet
| one.
| Microsoft did some of these corrections allready (the RPC exploit) but they
| wore not enought
| regards
Attempts at infecteing Unix/Linux didn't fail. They weren't as successful as with Win16
and Win32.
Let see...
There was the Bliss. Remember that ?
Then there is the RST.a/RST.b (aka; ELF.RST.a), Rike, Ramen, Metaphor, Lindoes, Kagob and
the infamous OSF.8759.
We also have the Lion, Kork, Millen and Slapper worms and the Obsidian.
I'm sorry...
There is malware for the 'nix families whether they are configured properly or not, they
exist and there will continue to be new ones created. As the MAC and 'nix OS' become more
prevalent they too will have a larger targeting base.
Even the venerable VM/CMS had its virus holiday in '88 on Christmas < LOL >
Like the Amiga ? It had viruses. It even got Aids < lol >
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp