Windows Vista The Vista Death Watch

  • Thread starter Thread starter AirRaid
  • Start date Start date
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Ken;
Assuming all your hardware and software is supported by windows Vista
64, it should be stable.
Did the computer come with Vista 64?
Do you have the latest Vista 64 bit drivers?
Is ALL your hardware supported by Vista 64?

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Violent Ken" <Violent.Ken.304nr3@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message
news:Violent.Ken.304nr3@no-mx.forums.net...
>
> ok im worried i installed ultimate x64
>
> is 32 bit vista this unstable....?
>
>
> --
> Violent Ken
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Are you able to contribute anything to help the OP?
Apparently not.
Or are you unable to help but feel a need to post so your only
contribution is an attack?
Apparently so.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:ehcrj3df8es43ier4762gf9hs60hqeprr3@4ax.com...
> Are all you "MVP" retards top-posting idiots?
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

chrisv wrote:
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] top-posted:
>
>> "says that the manufacturers won't supply them"
>> What manufacturers have they trued?
>> Which have they not tried?
>> Dell, Toshiba and possibly others continue to sell computers with
>> Windows XP:
>> http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=gen&c=ca&l=en&cs=&k=windows+xp&cat=all
>
> Are all you "MVP" retards top-posting idiots?
>

Most of them and they also use a delimiter for their signature so that
when you use a real newsreader, it nukes everything but the MVP's
useless post.

Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

On 2007-11-16, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] top-posted:
>
>>"says that the manufacturers won't supply them"
>>What manufacturers have they trued?
>>Which have they not tried?
>>Dell, Toshiba and possibly others continue to sell computers with
>>Windows XP:
>>http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=gen&c=ca&l=en&cs=&k=windows+xp&cat=all
>
> Are all you "MVP" retards top-posting idiots?

Yes. Their unspeakably crappy newsreader puts the cursor there, and they're too
dumb (or lazy) to move it. Presumably they also **** in their pants because
that's where their arseholes are.


--
"Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
and presumptuous desire for a second one."
[email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

No, alias, that is your newsreader deleting whatever you do not see.
"it nukes everything"
"it" being your newsreader.
Change your settings or choose to live with what your newsreader does.
However I expect you will keep blaming anything Microsoft because that
is what you feel the need to do regardless of your own choices.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
news:fhkfkd$dbm$1@aioe.org...
> Most of them and they also use a delimiter for their signature so
> that when you use a real newsreader, it nukes everything but the
> MVP's useless post.
>
> Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

Completely idiotic top-posting with quoting as a signature (how low life
are these MVPs to act so retarded?) repaired to be readable

>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>news:ehcrj3df8es43ier4762gf9hs60hqeprr3@4ax.com...
>> Are all you "MVP" retards top-posting idiots?

Apparently they are

> Are you able to contribute anything to help the OP?

Who knows? You nimwits destroy all context by quoting as a signature

> Apparently not.

Apparently or not, nobody knows

> Or are you unable to help but feel a need to post so your only
> contribution is an attack?

Well, you (as a MVP naturally) are unable to read. Figures, after all you
are a MVP. Those are not expected to have any intelligence worth mentioning

If you /were/ able to understand simple sentences with very small words, you
could have figured that the OP did not ask a question to a nagging problem
he has with Vista

> Apparently so.
>

Well, you are apparently a MVP. To act any dumber, you need to be a apple
fanboi
--
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
Form follows malfunction.
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
> No, alias, that is your newsreader deleting whatever you do not see.
> "it nukes everything"
> "it" being your newsreader.
> Change your settings or choose to live with what your newsreader does.
> However I expect you will keep blaming anything Microsoft because that
> is what you feel the need to do regardless of your own choices.
>

If you would bottom post, no one would have a problem with your posts.
So, it isn't MS to blame but YOU and other top posters who have no
consideration for others. I believe that Windows Fail can be configured
to bottom post.

Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
change to suit your preferences.
So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can
do.

There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or
bottom posting.
Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a
problem with posting methods.
The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such
as yourself.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
news:fhkgeh$f1i$2@aioe.org...
> If you would bottom post, no one would have a problem with your
> posts. So, it isn't MS to blame but YOU and other top posters who
> have no consideration for others. I believe that Windows Fail can be
> configured to bottom post.
>
> Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
> change to suit your preferences.
> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>
> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or bottom
> posting.
> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a problem
> with posting methods.
> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such as
> yourself.
>

Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability
to understand that notwithstanding.

BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
products so your theory is false.

Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch


"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhkhq0$j8g$2@aioe.org...
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>> change to suit your preferences.
>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>
>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or bottom
>> posting.
>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a problem
>> with posting methods.
>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such as
>> yourself.
>>
>
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will continue
> to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom posting is the
> only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability to understand that
> notwithstanding.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS products
> so your theory is false.

Translation: Alias doesn't have any respect for others because you keep
posting about Ubuntu when others tell you it isn't appropriate here. You
expect people to stop top posting. People expect you to stop preaching
Ubuntu.

Get over it.

>
> Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

"Translation"
That may be part of your problem.
Instead of attempting to translate to whatever interpretation suits
your agenda, simply read what is written.

"Bottom posting is the only acceptable"
Not at all, top and bottom posting are fully acceptable in these
Microsoft newsgroups.
Your inability to accept that fact is only your limitation.
Of course if you can point to where Microsoft states bottom posting is
expected in the Microsoft newsgroups.
But I have asked you that before and you were strangely silent.

"so your theory is false."
I gave no theory.
Possibly another incorrect "Translation".

It seems you are unable to get past criticisms and deal with the
issues at hand.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
news:fhkhq0$j8g$2@aioe.org...
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your
> inability to understand that notwithstanding.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
> products so your theory is false.
>
> Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Alias wrote:

> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>> change to suit your preferences.
>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>
>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or bottom
>> posting.
>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a problem
>> with posting methods.
>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such as
>> yourself.
>>
>
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability
> to understand that notwithstanding.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
> products so your theory is false.
>
> Alias

JJ's problem is that he's into the MickeyMouse mindset which states: "take
any sort of standard developed in the computer world, ignore that standard
and replace with a MickeyMouse "standard" that effectively breaks the
norm."

We see this ALL the time when it comes to MickeyMouse and is another reason
that people are getting fed up with MickeyMouse.

Usenet has been around a long time and has developed standards. Trust
MickeyMouse and its fan boys to continually try and break those standards.
They are simply pathetic.

Cheers.

--
Remove Vista Activation Completely ...
http://tinyurl.com/2w8qqo

Frank - seek help immediately! Visit ...
http://www.binsa.org/
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

> "Translation"
> That may be part of your problem.
> Instead of attempting to translate to whatever interpretation suits
> your agenda, simply read what is written.
>
> "Bottom posting is the only acceptable"
> Not at all, top and bottom posting are fully acceptable in these
> Microsoft newsgroups.
> Your inability to accept that fact is only your limitation.
> Of course if you can point to where Microsoft states bottom posting is
> expected in the Microsoft newsgroups.
> But I have asked you that before and you were strangely silent.
>
> "so your theory is false."
> I gave no theory.
> Possibly another incorrect "Translation".
>
> It seems you are unable to get past criticisms and deal with the
> issues at hand.
>

Hey numbnuts, the vaste majority of people around here access this ng
through Usenet, not through MickeyMouse's servers. Don't you think it's
time that you accepted that fact and acted accordingly and followed Usenet
standards? You MickeyMouse fan boys have no regard at all to anyone but
yourselves. It's part of the pompous MickeyMouse attitudes you MVP have
become infamous for.

Cheers.

--
Remove Vista Activation Completely ...
http://tinyurl.com/2w8qqo

Frank - seek help immediately! Visit ...
http://www.binsa.org/
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

NoStop wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>>> change to suit your preferences.
>>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>>
>>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or bottom
>>> posting.
>>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a problem
>>> with posting methods.
>>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such as
>>> yourself.
>>>
>> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
>> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
>> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability
>> to understand that notwithstanding.
>>
>> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
>> products so your theory is false.
>>
>> Alias
>
> JJ's problem is that he's into the MickeyMouse mindset which states: "take
> any sort of standard developed in the computer world, ignore that standard
> and replace with a MickeyMouse "standard" that effectively breaks the
> norm."

Like a bully in a school yard.

>
> We see this ALL the time when it comes to MickeyMouse and is another reason
> that people are getting fed up with MickeyMouse.

One of the many.

>
> Usenet has been around a long time and has developed standards. Trust
> MickeyMouse and its fan boys to continually try and break those standards.
> They are simply pathetic.
>
> Cheers.

I think Disney's Mickey Mouse will stand up to time a lot more than
Redmond's.

Alias
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Alias wrote:
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>
>> If you do not like it, it is up to you to change.
>> Make the change if you must, but it is not your place to insist others
>> change to suit your preferences.
>> So typical of you, to criticize when there is nothing better you can do.
>>
>> There in no requirement either way in these newsgroups for top or
>> bottom posting.
>> Both are fully acceptable and appropriate.
>> It is noted that it is usually the Microsoft critics that have a
>> problem with posting methods.
>> The rest are usually more flexible and go with the conditions.
>> However inflexibility is somewhat normal for some of the critics such
>> as yourself.
>>
>
> Translation: Jupiter doesn't have any respect for others and will
> continue to top post regardless of how it affects the posts. Bottom
> posting is the only acceptable and logical way to post, your inability
> to understand that notwithstanding.

Translation; alias didn't get his way so blusters, insults and lies
about it.
As for not having any respect for others, you are the prime example of
just such a person. Your very presence in this MS Vista ng promoting
your childish toy os is insulting and disrespectful to everyone here.
>
> BTW, I bottom posted back when I used OE with 95 and loved all MS
> products so your theory is false.

You always have trouble with the truth don't you. Why not leave if you
don't like it? You don't use Vista, don't have it, can't afford it and
hate it. So leave. You'll be much happier over at the open sores ng's.
Frank
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Another post from someone only capable of criticism when something
constructive is unknown.

"We see this ALL the time..."
Yes, your inability to adapt to change and instead see your way as the
way others must comply.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:8al%i.2403$fD.1836@pd7urf3no...
> JJ's problem is that he's into the MickeyMouse mindset which states:
> "take
> any sort of standard developed in the computer world, ignore that
> standard
> and replace with a MickeyMouse "standard" that effectively breaks
> the
> norm."
>
> We see this ALL the time when it comes to MickeyMouse and is another
> reason
> that people are getting fed up with MickeyMouse.
>
> Usenet has been around a long time and has developed standards.
> Trust
> MickeyMouse and its fan boys to continually try and break those
> standards.
> They are simply pathetic.
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Remove Vista Activation Completely ...
> http://tinyurl.com/2w8qqo
>
> Frank - seek help immediately! Visit ...
> http://www.binsa.org/
>
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:48:40 -0500, Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin] wrote:

> John C. Dvorak has been wrong so many times he has become the most
> irrelevant technology journalist of the 20th and 21st century. When Windows
> 3.0 was released, he said people would check it out once then go back to
> DOS.

Most of them did. MS Windows was not usable untile 3.1.
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

Ace wrote:
> You forgot Vista Enterprise. :)
> It doesn't show on the list with versions on the Microsoft website, but I
> do have the official disc in front of me here.
> It was also the only version offered for my organisation (a public
> college) through the company that organises and distributes software for
> us.
>

And Vista 32 and Vista 64 and Vista N and Vista K...

> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in
> news:Or99rqBKIHA.5224@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>
>> "there are too many versions"
>> 4 - XP Home, XP Pro, XP Tablet PC and XP Media Center
>> There are also 4 with windows Vista, Home Basic, Home Premium,
>> Business and Ultimate.
>> There are others in Windows XP and Windows Vista, but they are not
>> applicable to most users.


--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -
Submit your nomination at the link below:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on
free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the
creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer
rights in the digital age are not frivolous."
- Maura Corbett
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

"Hey numbnuts..."
More of your name calling.
Typical of those unable to deal with or insecure in their own stand on
the issue.
More telling of your own character issues while saying nothing of
anyone elses.

"have no regard at all to anyone"
I accept both and it is you that is so intolerant of others.
you should read your post, perhaps for the first time.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ucl%i.1961$PE.125@pd7urf1no...
> Hey numbnuts, the vaste majority of people around here access this
> ng
> through Usenet, not through MickeyMouse's servers. Don't you think
> it's
> time that you accepted that fact and acted accordingly and followed
> Usenet
> standards? You MickeyMouse fan boys have no regard at all to anyone
> but
> yourselves. It's part of the pompous MickeyMouse attitudes you MVP
> have
> become infamous for.
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Remove Vista Activation Completely ...
> http://tinyurl.com/2w8qqo
>
> Frank - seek help immediately! Visit ...
> http://www.binsa.org/
 
Re: The Vista Death Watch

"Like a bully in a school yard."
And yet it is you attacking me.
Do you even read what you post?

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
news:fhkn54$6rp$1@aioe.org...
>>
>> JJ's problem is that he's into the MickeyMouse mindset which
>> states: "take
>> any sort of standard developed in the computer world, ignore that
>> standard
>> and replace with a MickeyMouse "standard" that effectively breaks
>> the
>> norm."
>
> Like a bully in a school yard.
>
>>
>> We see this ALL the time when it comes to MickeyMouse and is
>> another reason
>> that people are getting fed up with MickeyMouse.
>
> One of the many.
>
>>
>> Usenet has been around a long time and has developed standards.
>> Trust
>> MickeyMouse and its fan boys to continually try and break those
>> standards.
>> They are simply pathetic.
>>
>> Cheers.
>
> I think Disney's Mickey Mouse will stand up to time a lot more than
> Redmond's.
>
> Alias
 
Back
Top