Re: OEM
Thanks again to all. It's a good thing I am close to being a lawyer and can
read the legal mumbo jumbo in the clauses. Until now I really never looked
at the extra fine print. Always stopped at the hearsay, don't do this or
that. My fault for not asking the right people or reading before.
However, as I mentioned, I have other than Microsoft products "licenses"
that spell out can not be transferred/sold/etc. at all. After reading
everyone's replies, sounds like Microsoft is a little more consumer friendly
and isn't as greedy as other software companies.
But, now I know how to assess for a good product and vendor to buy that
product.
Also, like Alias mentioned, I think there is an educational issue with the
little guy "common end user" believing they are buying a product rather than
the agreement if you will.
"Donald L McDaniel" <orthocross@comcast.invalid> wrote in message
news:6cret3d8429g8i5h493nuger0lh194rqpo@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:16:52 +0100, "DM" <themusgravefamily@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I have been thinking of this issue for a while. Not only for Microsoft but
>>for any software.
>>
>>Any hardware, appliance, DVD, cd, vhs, furniture, house, car, etc. we can
>>buy/sell/trade to anyone but not software. Why is it that most digital
>>products with licenses cant be yard saled away like ma's old sewing
>>machine?
>>What happened to the 9/10 rule? My car has a title, license if you will,
>>and
>>I can sell it to anyone. My autographed babe ruth card has a certificate
>>of
>>authenticity, license if you will, and I can sell it.
>
> Actually, DM, one CAN sell his Microsoft licenses, IF he does it
> according to the Microsoft-stated terms for re-sale of such licenses.
>
> There is absolutely nothing stopping you from taking all your
> licenses, and putting them out for sale in a yard-sale. But you must
> abide by the clause concerning re-sale of your license.
>
> Additionally, there are differences in the terms which apply to the
> re-sale of an OEM license, and the sale of a Retail product.
>
> Mainly:
> 1) Retail software licenses may be resold/transferred to another
> person, who would then become the holder of that license until he
> either dies or transfers the license to another person. This may be
> done unconditionally, as long as the original COA, packaging, and
> media are transferred. i.e., "One license, for one machine at a time,
> for the life of the holder of the license, which license may be
> transferred unconditionally to another person at any time."
> 2) OEM software licenses, on the other hand, while they may be resold
> or transferred to another person, who would become the holder of that
> license, the original machine upon which the license was originally
> installed must accompany the transfer of the license. i.e., "One
> license, for one specific machine, which must remain with that machine
> for the life of the machine, whether the license is transferred or
> not".
>
>
>>
>>
>>"Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:OrZbgktgIHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:51:22 +0100, Alias
>>>> <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>>>>>> In tests conducted by Microsoft
>>>>> Enough said, the tests are invalid as are most of Carey's posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> So, such tests are always invalid when published by Microsoft? That
>>>> is the implication you are trying to get over here.
>>>
>>> MS doesn't want you to buy used copies of Windows. They want you to buy
>>> Windows from them.
>>>
>>> Snip drivel.
>>>
>>> Alias
>
> --
> Donald L McDaniel
>
> How can so many otherwise very intelligent people screw up
> something so simple so badly? If you stick a computer
> keyboard in front of most people, they'll suddenly drop
> 30 points off their IQs. Much like placing a "Pork Barrel"
> bill in front of a politician: He'll forget all about
> "cooperation" the minute he counts the zeroes before the
> decimal point.