Windows Vista Linux is not readly for prime time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Yanaire
  • Start date Start date
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Hound Dog wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> What's happening is that you the dog, Frank the Wank and Broke Bill
>> are living in fantasy land and you think it's reality.
>>
>
> You keep trying to defend your position of not being a troll, when you
> are a troll Alias adding to the noise level.
>
> I just saw Ringmaster Albright post. Let's see if he will be stupid
> enough like your are to join you in this.
>
> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just
> egg you on to see where you're going to go next.
>
>

That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is
revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common
decency.

Alias
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FAB wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime
>>>>> time:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>> for that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one
>>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do
>>>> you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in
>>>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the
>>>>> effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>> this judgment.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> False.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning
>>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not
>>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format
>>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not
>>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they
>>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>> available.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as
>>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense
>>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially
>>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its
>>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The
>>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just
>>>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of
>>>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There
>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> More of your lies?
>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and
>>> daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>> Loser!
>>
>>
>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>
> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?

Frank's jealous.

Alias
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> FAB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>>> for that?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one
>>>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do
>>>>> you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications
>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to
>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>>> this judgment.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> False.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning
>>>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not
>>>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format
>>>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not
>>>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they
>>>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>>> available.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as
>>>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense
>>>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially
>>>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its
>>>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The
>>>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not
>>>>>> just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers
>>>>>> of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There
>>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> More of your lies?
>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked
>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>> Loser!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>
>>
>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>
>
> Frank's jealous.
>

hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
Got those degrees in lying huh!
How wonderful!
You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

> Hound Dog wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Hound Dog wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hound Dog wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snipped>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even Ringmaster Albright is not this stupid to bite. They bait
>>>>>> you, and you bite every time. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I did not post for you or for Bill. I posted for those who might
>>>>> think Bill was posting something that's true, something Bill and
>>>>> you are incapable of doing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are totally blind, ridiculous and too easy. Don't you know that
>>>> when you respond like that, it makes you look like you are crazy?
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, your response does that.
>>
>>
>> But you're the one that seems to respond to everything making yourself
>> look foolish. Your reputation is already shot, and you continue to
>> pure gasoline on your own flames.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you in *love* with Linux.
>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>>
>> I disagree.
>>
>>>
>>>> Just like no one should *hate* an O/S, no one should be in *love*
>>>> with one either. <wink>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't hate or love any OS. I use them.
>>>
>>
>> So you accuse other's of the hate, which is what you posted in the
>> Linux Advocacy NG when you have exhibited the same tendencies in the
>> NG. You also call others trolls when you continue to keep the noise
>> level up yourself.
>>
>> Somehow, you continue to make yourself out to not be a troll, when you
>> are in fact a troll. You have all the tendencies.
>>
>>
>>
>
> If you plan to be a shrink, don't give up your day job.

And your day job is lying and trolling.
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

> Hound Dog wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> What's happening is that you the dog, Frank the Wank and Broke Bill
>>> are living in fantasy land and you think it's reality.
>>>
>>
>> You keep trying to defend your position of not being a troll, when you
>> are a troll Alias adding to the noise level.
>>
>> I just saw Ringmaster Albright post. Let's see if he will be stupid
>> enough like your are to join you in this.
>>
>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just
>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next.
>>
>>
>
> That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is
> revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common
> decency.

Hey sheep-fukker, you're stupid...his booting your ignorant lying
trolling ass all over this ng...as is obvious to all...except maybe you?
Hahaha!
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>>>> for that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line
>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called
>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications
>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to
>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>>>> this judgment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra
>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by
>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition
>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with it.
>>>>>>> It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from such
>>>>>>> hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly
>>>>>>> under the radar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same
>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of
>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside,
>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty
>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a
>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on both
>>>>>>> sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled
>>>>>>> with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on
>>>>>>> an on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with
>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked
>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>> Loser!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>
>>
>> Frank's jealous.
>>
>
> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
> Got those degrees in lying huh!
> How wonderful!
> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>

Frank's *really* jealous.

Alias
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

> FAB wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>
>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime
>>>> time:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a gazillion
>>>> commands to make it do what you want, and who has time for that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one
>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do
>>> you know what it is, lamer?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth of
>>>> specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform emulators
>>>> are lame.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in
>>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the
>>>> effect of making the apps any better.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>> this judgment.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to
>>>> actually use.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> False.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms or
>>>> stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning
>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not the
>>>> least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard
>>>> disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not so
>>>> clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just
>>>> have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you can
>>> customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>> available.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as
>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense
>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially
>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its
>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The
>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just
>>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of
>>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs
>>>> to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>
>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> More of your lies?
>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and
>> daily make a fool out of yourself.
>> Loser!
>
>
> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>
> Alias

Thanks for proving my point (once again).
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB wrote:

>
> Hey sheep-fukker, you're stupid... ignorant lying
> trolling ass

Enough said.

Alias
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:
>
> That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is
> revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common
> decency.
>


The fact that you respond Alias makes you a troll. You keep the noise
level up to a fever pitch. You're just one person. Do you really see us
coming after anyone else other than you or Albright with the game you
fail to recognize? We come after you two, because you both are trolls
and you'll respond particularly you Alias. It's the nature of the beast
-- you.
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

> FAB wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey sheep-fukker, you're stupid... ignorant lying trolling ass
>
>
> Enough said.

Trouble with the truth...again...as usual?
let all act really surprised!
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

>
> If you plan to be a shrink, don't give up your day job.
>

You're the only patient I have that's on the couch, stupid. But you are
just that stupid, and you fail to see what is happening to you.
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

> FAB wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>>>>> for that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line
>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called
>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is
>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and there
>>>>>>>> is a dearth of specialized software for particular uses.
>>>>>>>> Cross-platform emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications
>>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to
>>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>>>>> this judgment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are
>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses,
>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra
>>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by
>>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition
>>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with
>>>>>>>> it. It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from
>>>>>>>> such hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as
>>>>>>>> they fly under the radar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux
>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness
>>>>>>>> of vitality of their system, and there is no real professional
>>>>>>>> help available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same
>>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of
>>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside,
>>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty
>>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a
>>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on
>>>>>>>> both sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is
>>>>>>>> filled with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands,
>>>>>>>> and on an on. There needs to be balance from people not so
>>>>>>>> smitten with something.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you
>>>>>>>> more easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked
>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>
>>
>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>> How wonderful!
>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>
>
> Frank's *really* jealous.

Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
You deserve it...LOL!
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time


"FAB" <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in message
news:Ox2vWpO7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FAB wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>>>>>> for that?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one
>>>>>>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do
>>>>>>>> you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications
>>>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to
>>>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>>>>>> this judgment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning
>>>>>>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not
>>>>>>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format
>>>>>>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not
>>>>>>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they
>>>>>>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as
>>>>>>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense
>>>>>>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially
>>>>>>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its
>>>>>>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The
>>>>>>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not
>>>>>>>>> just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers
>>>>>>>>> of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There
>>>>>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked
>>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>
>>>
>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>> How wonderful!
>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>
>>
>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>
> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
> You deserve it...LOL!
>

If they gave out degrees in lying you would have a Masters and a PhD.
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time



Bill Yanaire wrote:
> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime time:
>
>
>
> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against Linux, its
> that I can't be for it.
>
> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a gazillion
> commands to make it do what you want, and who has time for that?
>

I have installed and setup Ubuntu for computer novices. The install
included setting up and configuring Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice and
a few other applications like Gimp plus the standard applications that
came with Ubuntu. I also installed a printer for them. All they need
to do is log on and use the applications. No viruses, no security
breaches and it never crashes for them. They almost never have to
reboot it and they have no trouble.

And they do notg know even 1 command.
> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly second
> rate,
Not true. Open Office behaves better than MS Office and handles graphic
much better. And for those who like Picasa you can download the Linux
version and it works great.
> which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth of specialized
> software for particular uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame.
>
> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for home users,
> especially since customizing does not seem to be to the effect of making the
> apps any better.
>
> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to
> actually use.
>
No they are not. As a matter of fact Nautilus is superior to Windows
Explorer. It does not crash and has better ease of use.
> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms or
> stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning time,
> research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not the least of them
> being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going
> to play around with it. It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune
> from such hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly
> under the radar.
>
Once you set it up properly for a novice they have no learning curve and
no issues.
> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users who will
> actually be angry if you question the usefulness of vitality of their
> system, and there is no real professional help available.
>

That is not true. While there are some that meet that description most
are helpful. Peer support is very good. But the average plain old user
does not need support.
> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as cheap.
> Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense attached to a
> Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially since I found myself
> surprised by its difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading
> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that there are
> opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is
> filled with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an
> on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>
> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm suggesting
> lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more easily: "Should I
> choose Linux?"
>
>
>
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time


"Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message
news:j2Khk.17064$89.11556@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> "FAB" <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in message
> news:Ox2vWpO7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> FAB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>>>>>>> for that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line
>>>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called
>>>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>>>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications
>>>>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to
>>>>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>>>>>>> this judgment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>>>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra
>>>>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by
>>>>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition
>>>>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with it.
>>>>>>>>>> It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from such
>>>>>>>>>> hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly
>>>>>>>>>> under the radar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same
>>>>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of
>>>>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside,
>>>>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty
>>>>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a
>>>>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on both
>>>>>>>>>> sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled
>>>>>>>>>> with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on
>>>>>>>>>> an on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with
>>>>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked
>>>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>>> How wonderful!
>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>>
>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
>> You deserve it...LOL!
>>
>
> If they gave out degrees in lying you would have a Masters and a PhD.
>
>
>

Oops. The above message was meant for Alias.
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416
@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:


> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just
> egg you on to see where you're going to go next.

Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then.
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Bill Yanaire wrote:
> "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message
> news:j2Khk.17064$89.11556@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> "FAB" <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in message
>> news:Ox2vWpO7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>>>>>>>> for that?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line
>>>>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called
>>>>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>>>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>>>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>>>>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications
>>>>>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to
>>>>>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>>>>>>>> this judgment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>>>>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>>>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra
>>>>>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by
>>>>>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition
>>>>>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with it.
>>>>>>>>>>> It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from such
>>>>>>>>>>> hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly
>>>>>>>>>>> under the radar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>>>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>>>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>>>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>>>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same
>>>>>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of
>>>>>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside,
>>>>>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty
>>>>>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a
>>>>>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on both
>>>>>>>>>>> sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled
>>>>>>>>>>> with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on
>>>>>>>>>>> an on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with
>>>>>>>>>>> something.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>>>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked
>>>>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>>>
>>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>>>> How wonderful!
>>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>>>
>>>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
>>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
>>> You deserve it...LOL!
>>>
>> If they gave out degrees in lying you would have a Masters and a PhD.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oops. The above message was meant for Alias.
>
>
>

The first post was correct.

Alias
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

DanS wrote:
> Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416
> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>
>
>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just
>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next.
>
> Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then.
>

You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but
I'll join in on the fun.

http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm

And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the
Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but
that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when
you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy as
you chase.

You fess-up to being a <stalker>.

I myself, I am an EOR Specialist, and to you, that's Equal Opportunity
Ragger. You don't fukk with me, and I don't fukk with you.

Alias choose to get in my face, like Albright chosen to and now you. I
didn't put any of you there. You put yourself there.
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:e36dycQ7IHA.2260
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:

> DanS wrote:
>> Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416
>> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>
>>
>>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just
>>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next.
>>
>> Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then.
>>
>
> You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but
> I'll join in on the fun.

Gang mentality....gotta love it.

>
> http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
>
> And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the
> Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but
> that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when
> you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy
as
> you chase.
>
> You fess-up to being a <stalker>.

Get your nose opened ? What does that mean ?

As I chase what ? All I do is point out when the pot is calling the
kettle black, and post corrective information when some gluebag makes
claims that I know are absolutely false or only partial truths......ex. -
Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.

I also don't participate in COLA, and am not even subscribed to it. Those
posts are crossposted to this group, an XP group, an Ubuntu group (where
I see them), and COLA. As of late I have also been trying to remember to
remove the 2 Windows groups from my replies.

A stalker...ha! If you so wish. At least I don't hide behind multiple
personalities/posting names......and refuse to admit it when I've been
caught........
 
Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

DanS wrote:

<snipped>

You're not worth a read. You just might go off with some off the wall
reply post like you did the last time, nut.

Dan Silly, go on now and crawl back to your <stalker> hole. You are
worthless to me.
 

Similar threads

I
Key Principles of Functional Programming: The Time Is Now
Replies
0
Views
3
Industry Perspectives
I
G
where to get a product for server 2012 r2
Replies
1
Views
273
RSchwarz
RSchwarz
Cloaked
Tech Could Use More Susan Wojcickis
Replies
0
Views
14
Cloaked
Cloaked
C
CentOS Stand-in Rocky Linux Becomes a Ready-for-Prime-Time Player
Replies
0
Views
49
Christine Hall
C
N
App Dev Leaders Struggle with Rising Workloads, Limited Time for Innovation
Replies
0
Views
48
Nathan Eddy
N
Back
Top