Windows Vista Linux is not readly for prime time

[Frank]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

DanS wrote:

> Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
------------------------------------------------------
Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
Now you're lying!

 

[Ringmaster]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:00:45 -0400, Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote:

>DanS wrote:
>> Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416
>> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>
>>
>>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just
>>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next.
>>
>> Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then.
>>
>
>You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but
>I'll join in on the fun.
>
>http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
>
>And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the
>Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but
>that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when
>you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy as
>you chase.

In some ways you're more psychotic then Frank. How many more times
will you change the name you post under in some feeble attempt to hide
who you are? What a loser.
>
>You fess-up to being a <stalker>.
>
>I myself, I am an EOR Specialist, and to you, that's Equal Opportunity
>Ragger. You don't fukk with me, and I don't fukk with you.

You are just another idiot that squats in this newsgroup. Nothing
more.
>
>Alias choose to get in my face, like Albright chosen to and now you. I
>didn't put any of you there. You put yourself there.

You sound like a psycho. Get in your face? If I ever got in "your
face" for any of you idiots you all would piss in your pants out of
fear. Thank you lucky stars you're all gutless morons hiding behind
your computer and can only make some feeble brave talk through your
keyboard. Face to face you wouldn't last ten seconds.

 

[DanS]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org:

> DanS wrote:
>
>> Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
> Now you're lying!
>

Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread.

 

[DanS]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:OqT8hnR7IHA.2336
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:

> DanS wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
> You're not worth a read. You just might go off with some off the wall
> reply post like you did the last time, nut.
>
> Dan Silly, go on now and crawl back to your <stalker> hole. You are
> worthless to me.

Then stop reading my posts and replying to them.

Practice some self control.

 

[Spanky deMonkey, ESQ]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time


"Ringmaster" <bigtop@VistaGeneralCircus.net> wrote in message
newssif849fm8ckftj6a39or1jm7q4boun83k@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:00:45 -0400, Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote:
>
>>DanS wrote:
>>> Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416
>>> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just
>>>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next.
>>>
>>> Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then.
>>>
>>
>>You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but
>>I'll join in on the fun.
>>
>>http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm
>>
>>And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the
>>Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but
>>that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when
>>you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy as
>>you chase.
>
> In some ways you're more psychotic then Frank. How many more times
> will you change the name you post under in some feeble attempt to hide
> who you are? What a loser.
>>
>>You fess-up to being a <stalker>.
>>
>>I myself, I am an EOR Specialist, and to you, that's Equal Opportunity
>>Ragger. You don't fukk with me, and I don't fukk with you.
>
> You are just another idiot that squats in this newsgroup. Nothing
> more.
>>
>>Alias choose to get in my face, like Albright chosen to and now you. I
>>didn't put any of you there. You put yourself there.
>
> You sound like a psycho. Get in your face? If I ever got in "your
> face" for any of you idiots you all would piss in your pants out of
> fear. Thank you lucky stars you're all gutless morons hiding behind
> your computer and can only make some feeble brave talk through your
> keyboard. Face to face you wouldn't last ten seconds.

That's what your ex-wife said. You only lasted 'ten seconds'. That's why
she divorced your ass. The other reason was you had a tiny little pecker.

 

[FAB]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

DanS wrote:

> Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org:
>
>
>>DanS wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------
>>Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
>>Now you're lying!
>>
>
>
> Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread.

No, it's not true. You look it up, liar!

 

[toad]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Bill Yanaire wrote:

> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime
> time:
>
>
>
> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>
> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a gazillion
> commands to make it do what you want, and who has time for that?
>
> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth of
> specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform emulators
> are lame.
>
> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for home
> users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the effect
> of making the apps any better.
>
> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to
> actually use.
>
> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms or
> stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning time,
> research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not the least
> of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard disks
> if you are going to play around with it. It is also not so clear that
> Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just have a
> reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>
> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users who
> will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of vitality of
> their system, and there is no real professional help available.
>
> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as
> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense
> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially
> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its
> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The
> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just
> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of
> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs
> to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>
> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"

Please spell it correctly next time - it is Linsux - geez.

Toad

--

 

[the wharf rat]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

In article <ReIhk.16057$mh5.1886@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com>,
Bill Yanaire <bill@yanaire.com> wrote:
>
>The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to
>actually use.
>

Bzzzzt. X11 predates windows 1.0 by about 18 months. And
Unixes had useable windowed desktops when MS was still tiling little
squares on 14" CRTs.

>being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going

Lol. You miserable troll. You dont' have to frequently format
ANY modern system's drives.

>there is no real professional help available.

You DO know that Redhat, SUSE, Dell, IBM, Sun, and about
a hundred other companies offer commercial linux support, right, troll?

>surprised by its difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading
>instructions from a $30 book.

Yeah, I had the same problem with linear algebra. And the
book was like eighty bucks too!

 

[Alias]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FAB wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm
>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has
>>>>>>>>> time for that?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line
>>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called
>>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is
>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and
>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular uses.
>>>>>>>>> Cross-platform emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the
>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to
>>>>>>>> install it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent
>>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem to
>>>>>>>>> be to the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could
>>>>>>>> make this judgment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are
>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses,
>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra
>>>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by
>>>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition
>>>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with
>>>>>>>>> it. It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from
>>>>>>>>> such hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as
>>>>>>>>> they fly under the radar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click,
>>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux
>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness
>>>>>>>>> of vitality of their system, and there is no real professional
>>>>>>>>> help available.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same
>>>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of
>>>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside,
>>>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty
>>>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a
>>>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on
>>>>>>>>> both sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is
>>>>>>>>> filled with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their
>>>>>>>>> bands, and on an on. There needs to be balance from people not
>>>>>>>>> so smitten with something.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you
>>>>>>>>> more easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked
>>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>
>>>
>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>> How wonderful!
>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>
>>
>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>
> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.

Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous.

> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
> You deserve it...LOL!

Ye olde sour grapes again, eh?

Alias

 

[Alias]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FAB wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hey sheep-fukker, you're stupid... ignorant lying trolling ass
>>
>>
>> Enough said.
>
> Trouble with the truth...again...as usual?
> let all act really surprised!
>

Not at all but you sure do.

Alias

 

[Alias]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Hound Dog yelped:

> Alias wrote:
>>
>> That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is
>> revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common
>> decency.
>>
>
>
> The fact that you respond Alias makes you a troll.

False.

> You keep the noise
> level up to a fever pitch.

False.

> You're just one person.

Gosh, did you figure that one out all by yourself?

> Do you really see us
> coming after anyone else other than you or Albright with the game you
> fail to recognize?

I'm not playing your game, your delusion that I am notwithstanding.

> We come after you two, because you both are trolls

No, you post here all day long because you have no life and you are a
troll. So are Frank and Broke Bill.

> and you'll respond particularly you Alias.

Huh?

> It's the nature of the beast
> -- you.

Like I said, don't give up your day job. You're not a shrink and you're
no a very good troll.

Alias

 

[Alias]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FAB wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime
>>>>> time:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against
>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time
>>>>> for that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one
>>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do
>>>> you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly
>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth
>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform
>>>>> emulators are lame.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in
>>>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for
>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the
>>>>> effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make
>>>> this judgment.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive
>>>>> to actually use.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> False.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms
>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning
>>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not
>>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format
>>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not
>>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they
>>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you
>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users
>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of
>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help
>>>>> available.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as
>>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense
>>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially
>>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its
>>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The
>>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just
>>>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of
>>>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There
>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm
>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more
>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> More of your lies?
>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and
>>> daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>> Loser!
>>
>>
>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Thanks for proving my point (once again).

Proving that you are uneducated and a low life with no class is done by
you with your every post. I'm just confirming it.

Alias

 

[Frank]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

> FAB wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> FAB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm
>>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has
>>>>>>>>>> time for that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line
>>>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called
>>>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is
>>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and
>>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular uses.
>>>>>>>>>> Cross-platform emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the
>>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to
>>>>>>>>> install it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent
>>>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem to
>>>>>>>>>> be to the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could
>>>>>>>>> make this judgment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are
>>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses,
>>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the
>>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores
>>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent
>>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going
>>>>>>>>>> to play around with it. It is also not so clear that Linux
>>>>>>>>>> users are immune from such hazards, or if they just have a
>>>>>>>>>> reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click,
>>>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux
>>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the
>>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no real
>>>>>>>>>> professional help available.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the
>>>>>>>>>> same as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is
>>>>>>>>>> lots of expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of
>>>>>>>>>> upside, especially since I found myself surprised by its
>>>>>>>>>> difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading
>>>>>>>>>> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that
>>>>>>>>>> there are opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux
>>>>>>>>>> lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of things -- their
>>>>>>>>>> soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs to be
>>>>>>>>>> balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so
>>>>>>>>>> I'm suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find
>>>>>>>>>> you more easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass
>>>>>>>> kicked and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>>> How wonderful!
>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>>
>>
>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
>
>
> Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous.
>
>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
>> You deserve it...LOL!
>
>
> Ye olde sour grapes again, eh?
>
Ye olde backpedaling and denial again huh?
Figures!

 

[Alias]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> FAB wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for
>>>>>>>>>>> prime time:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has
>>>>>>>>>>> time for that?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command
>>>>>>>>>> line one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing
>>>>>>>>>> called CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is
>>>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and
>>>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular
>>>>>>>>>>> uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the
>>>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to
>>>>>>>>>> install it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent
>>>>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem to
>>>>>>>>>>> be to the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could
>>>>>>>>>> make this judgment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are
>>>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses,
>>>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the
>>>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores
>>>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent
>>>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going
>>>>>>>>>>> to play around with it. It is also not so clear that Linux
>>>>>>>>>>> users are immune from such hazards, or if they just have a
>>>>>>>>>>> reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click,
>>>>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux
>>>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the
>>>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no real
>>>>>>>>>>> professional help available.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here,
>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the
>>>>>>>>>>> same as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is
>>>>>>>>>>> lots of expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of
>>>>>>>>>>> upside, especially since I found myself surprised by its
>>>>>>>>>>> difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading
>>>>>>>>>>> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that
>>>>>>>>>>> there are opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux
>>>>>>>>>>> lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of things -- their
>>>>>>>>>>> soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs to be
>>>>>>>>>>> balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find
>>>>>>>>>>> you more easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass
>>>>>>>>> kicked and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>>>> How wonderful!
>>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
>>
>>
>> Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous.
>>
>>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
>>> You deserve it...LOL!
>>
>>
>> Ye olde sour grapes again, eh?
>>
> Ye olde backpedaling and denial again huh?
> Figures!

Just be a man instead of a lying low life slime ball and admit you're
jealous and wish that you had applied yourself more in school.

Alias

 

[FAB]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> FAB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready
>>>>>>>>>>>> for prime time:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has
>>>>>>>>>>>> time for that?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command
>>>>>>>>>>> line one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing
>>>>>>>>>>> called CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is
>>>>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular
>>>>>>>>>>>> uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the
>>>>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid
>>>>>>>>>>> to install it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent
>>>>>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be to the effect of making the apps any better.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could
>>>>>>>>>>> make this judgment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are
>>>>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses,
>>>>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the
>>>>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores
>>>>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent
>>>>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are
>>>>>>>>>>>> going to play around with it. It is also not so clear that
>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just
>>>>>>>>>>>> have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click,
>>>>>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the
>>>>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no real
>>>>>>>>>>>> professional help available.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here,
>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the
>>>>>>>>>>>> same as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is
>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot
>>>>>>>>>>>> of upside, especially since I found myself surprised by its
>>>>>>>>>>>> difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading
>>>>>>>>>>>> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that
>>>>>>>>>>>> there are opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>> lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of things --
>>>>>>>>>>>> their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find
>>>>>>>>>>>> you more easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass
>>>>>>>>>> kicked and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>>>>> How wonderful!
>>>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous.
>>>
>>>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
>>>> You deserve it...LOL!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ye olde sour grapes again, eh?
>>>
>> Ye olde backpedaling and denial again huh?
>> Figures!
>
>
> Just be a man instead of a lying low life slime ball and admit you're
> jealous and wish that you had applied yourself more in school.
>

Projecting again huh (as usual)?
Figures!

 

[Alias]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FAB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for prime time:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time for that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command
>>>>>>>>>>>> line one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> thing called CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>> to install it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-existent for home users, especially since customizing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not seem to be to the effect of making the apps any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could
>>>>>>>>>>>> make this judgment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores
>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to play around with it. It is also not so clear that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and
>>>>>>>>>>>> click, you can customize Ubuntu with no problems.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> real professional help available.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here,
>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of upside, especially since I found myself surprised by its
>>>>>>>>>>>>> difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are opinions on both sides, not just the hype of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of things
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There
>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find you more easily: "Should I choose Linux?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself,
>>>>>>>>>>>> troll?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> More of your lies?
>>>>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass
>>>>>>>>>>> kicked and daily make a fool out of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>> Loser!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he
>>>>>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frank's jealous.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker?
>>>>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh!
>>>>>>> How wonderful!
>>>>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank's *really* jealous.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous.
>>>>
>>>>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it!
>>>>> You deserve it...LOL!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ye olde sour grapes again, eh?
>>>>
>>> Ye olde backpedaling and denial again huh?
>>> Figures!
>>
>>
>> Just be a man instead of a lying low life slime ball and admit you're
>> jealous and wish that you had applied yourself more in school.
>>
>
> Projecting again huh (as usual)?
> Figures!
>

Being a low life slime ball liar again, eh?

Alias

 

[DanS]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in news:OYu0UQT7IHA.5164
@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:

> DanS wrote:
>
>> Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org:
>>
>>
>>>DanS wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
>>>Now you're lying!
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread.
>
> No, it's not true. You look it up, liar!

OK, here's the msg ID: <Xns9ADAA67CA8653thisnthatadelphianet@
85.214.90.236>

Or, look for the thread that is entitled "Vista SUCKS", or this GG link:

http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/bro
wse_thread/thread/d334fac51820f0df/38445ce8ab216fed?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#
38445ce8ab216fed

It plainly shows that OSX is less expensive than Vista.

Of course, I'm just wasting my time with you anyway, as you'll never
admit to anything, even things plain as day to everyone in the entire
world except you.

 

[FAB]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

DanS wrote:

> FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in news:OYu0UQT7IHA.5164
> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>
>
>>DanS wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>DanS wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
>>>>
>>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>>Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
>>>>Now you're lying!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread.
>>
>>No, it's not true. You look it up, liar!
>
>
> OK, here's the msg ID: <Xns9ADAA67CA8653thisnthatadelphianet@
> 85.214.90.236>
>
> Or, look for the thread that is entitled "Vista SUCKS", or this GG link:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/bro
> wse_thread/thread/d334fac51820f0df/38445ce8ab216fed?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#
> 38445ce8ab216fed
>
> It plainly shows that OSX is less expensive than Vista.
>
> Of course, I'm just wasting my time with you anyway, as you'll never
> admit to anything, even things plain as day to everyone in the entire
> world except you.

Your link doesn't work and you're a liar!
Go fukk yourself dan-o!

 

[Hunting for JackA$$]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB wrote:
> DanS wrote:
>

>> It plainly shows that OSX is less expensive than Vista.
>>
>> Of course, I'm just wasting my time with you anyway, as you'll never
>> admit to anything, even things plain as day to everyone in the entire
>> world except you.
>
> Your link doesn't work and you're a liar!
> Go fukk yourself dan-o!

It seems like DanS<alker> is on the stalk again. How did this lunatic
start thinking he was someone? How did this lunatic think that he is
somebody? He is no more than a NG POS wannabe police officer aka Barney
Phife trying to write tickets that won't hold.

 

[DanS]

Re: Linux is not readly for prime time

FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in
news:#V8PB9a7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:

> DanS wrote:
>
>> FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in news:OYu0UQT7IHA.5164
>> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>
>>
>>>DanS wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>DanS wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
>>>>>
>>>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
>>>>>Now you're lying!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread.
>>>
>>>No, it's not true. You look it up, liar!
>>
>>
>> OK, here's the msg ID: <Xns9ADAA67CA8653thisnthatadelphianet@
>> 85.214.90.236>
>>
>> Or, look for the thread that is entitled "Vista SUCKS", or this GG
>> link:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/
>> bro
>> wse_thread/thread/d334fac51820f0df/38445ce8ab216fed?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#
>> 38445ce8ab216fed
>>
>> It plainly shows that OSX is less expensive than Vista.
>>
>> Of course, I'm just wasting my time with you anyway, as you'll never
>> admit to anything, even things plain as day to everyone in the entire
>> world except you.
>
> Your link doesn't work and you're a liar!
> Go fukk yourself dan-o!

Well learn how to handle wrapped url's. It works fine.

Here, maybe this tiny url will work for you, you're used to tiny things.

http://tinyurl.com/5s59sv